Dying in Darkness: Deviations From Data Sharing Ethics in the US Public Health System and the Data Genocide of American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

Tribal governments and Tribal Epidemiology Centers face persistent challenges in obtaining the public health data that are essential to accomplishing their legal and ethical duties to promote health in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. We assessed the ethical implications of current impediments to data sharing among federal, state, and Tribal public health partners. Public health ethics obligates public health data sharing and opposes data collection without dissemination to affected communities. Privacy practices, like deidentification and data suppression, often obstruct data access, disproportionately affect American Indian and Alaska Native populations, and exacerbate health disparities. The 2020-2024 syphilis outbreak illustrates how restricted data access impedes effective public health responses. These practices represent a source of structuralized violence throughout the US public health system that contributes to the data genocide of American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Good governance practices like transparent data practices and the establishment of a social license (ie, the informal permission of a community to collect and use data) is essential to ethically balancing collective well-being with individual privacy in public health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/70983
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dying in Darkness: Deviations From Data Sharing Ethics in the US Public Health System and the Data Genocide of American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

Megan J. Doerr, Hye‐Chung Kum, Meghan Curry O’Connell, Charles Abourezk et al.
3 citations
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Public Health Policies and Education
8.45
article

Dying in Darkness: Deviations From Data Sharing Ethics in the US Public Health System and the Data Genocide of American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

Megan J. Doerr, Hye‐Chung Kum, Meghan Curry O’Connell, Charles Abourezk, Cason Schmit, Fallon J. Cochlin, Sarah Shewbrooks
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Tribal governments and Tribal Epidemiology Centers face persistent challenges in obtaining the public health data that are essential to accomplishing their legal and ethical duties to promote health in American Indian and Alaska Native communities. We assessed the ethical implications of current impediments to data sharing among federal, state, and Tribal public health partners. Public health ethics obligates public health data sharing and opposes data collection without dissemination to affected communities. Privacy practices, like deidentification and data suppression, often obstruct data access, disproportionately affect American Indian and Alaska Native populations, and exacerbate health disparities. The 2020-2024 syphilis outbreak illustrates how restricted data access impedes effective public health responses. These practices represent a source of structuralized violence throughout the US public health system that contributes to the data genocide of American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Good governance practices like transparent data practices and the establishment of a social license (ie, the informal permission of a community to collect and use data) is essential to ethically balancing collective well-being with individual privacy in public health.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 27
University of North Texas (US), Sage Bionetworks (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US), Texas A&M Health Science Center (US), Jule (United States) (US), Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland (CH), Great Plains Tribal Chairmen’s Health Board (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Public Health Policies and Education
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.