Supercritical water gasification and subsequent steam reforming of the product gas under elevated temperature and pressure

A continuous process combining the supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of ethanol with the subsequent steam reforming (SR) of the product gas was investigated. An experimental study was conducted that involved the operating parameters in the SR reactor, the ethanol concentration, and a comparison of two commercial catalysts for SR. With ethanol as a biomass model compound, complete gasification in the SCWG reactor was achieved. Regarding the SR reactor, high pressures, i.e., 20–40 bar, required a temperature of 750 °C to achieve methane conversion higher than 90% at a constant gas hourly space velocity of 63500 h −1 . The increase in EtOH concentration significantly decreased the steam/carbon ratio of the SCWG product and increased the content of CH 4 , C 2+ hydrocarbons, and CO. This in turn resulted in a decrease in H 2 yield in the SR reactor from 98.6% to 58.3%, as the EtOH concentration increased from 5 wt% to 20 wt% at a temperature of 730 °C, pressure of 30 bar, and a space velocity of 47877 h −1 . Under atmospheric pressure, both catalysts showed similar CH₄ conversion. However, at higher pressures (30–40 bar), the catalyst with the higher Ni loading exhibited greater activity in SR. • EtOH supercritical water gasification (SCWG) followed by steam reforming (SR). • Carbon Gasification Efficiency (CGE) during ethanol SCWG ranged from 97% to 99.6%. • CH 4 conversion after SR > 90% at 750 °C, 20–40 bar, and 63500 h −1 space velocity. • Increasing EtOH (5–20 wt%) .→ H₂ yield from 98.6% to 58.3%. • At 30–40 bar during SR, the Ni catalyst with higher loading had higher activity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.02.197
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supercritical water gasification and subsequent steam reforming of the product gas under elevated temperature and pressure

Jörg Sauer, Julian Dutzi, Dominik Neukum, Ν. Boukis et al.
2 citations
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
1.35
article

Supercritical water gasification and subsequent steam reforming of the product gas under elevated temperature and pressure

Jörg Sauer, Julian Dutzi, Dominik Neukum, Ν. Boukis, Angeliki A. Lemonidou, Athanasios A. Vadarlis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A continuous process combining the supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of ethanol with the subsequent steam reforming (SR) of the product gas was investigated. An experimental study was conducted that involved the operating parameters in the SR reactor, the ethanol concentration, and a comparison of two commercial catalysts for SR. With ethanol as a biomass model compound, complete gasification in the SCWG reactor was achieved. Regarding the SR reactor, high pressures, i.e., 20–40 bar, required a temperature of 750 °C to achieve methane conversion higher than 90% at a constant gas hourly space velocity of 63500 h −1 . The increase in EtOH concentration significantly decreased the steam/carbon ratio of the SCWG product and increased the content of CH 4 , C 2+ hydrocarbons, and CO. This in turn resulted in a decrease in H 2 yield in the SR reactor from 98.6% to 58.3%, as the EtOH concentration increased from 5 wt% to 20 wt% at a temperature of 730 °C, pressure of 30 bar, and a space velocity of 47877 h −1 . Under atmospheric pressure, both catalysts showed similar CH₄ conversion. However, at higher pressures (30–40 bar), the catalyst with the higher Ni loading exhibited greater activity in SR. • EtOH supercritical water gasification (SCWG) followed by steam reforming (SR). • Carbon Gasification Efficiency (CGE) during ethanol SCWG ranged from 97% to 99.6%. • CH 4 conversion after SR > 90% at 750 °C, 20–40 bar, and 63500 h −1 space velocity. • Increasing EtOH (5–20 wt%) .→ H₂ yield from 98.6% to 58.3%. • At 30–40 bar during SR, the Ni catalyst with higher loading had higher activity.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 111
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), Centre for Research and Technology Hellas (GR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Subcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.