Optimisation of Passive Energy Renovation Strategies in Residential Buildings for Life Cycle Global Warming Potential Reduction and Cost-effectiveness

Abstract The European Union (EU) regulations claim an efficient evaluation of the building renovation processes, highlighting the quantification of the life cycle carbon and cost-efficiency, towards the carbon-neutrality targets. The integration of the life cycle thinking (LCT) in the environmental field – by the life cycle assessment (LCA) – and in the economic field – by the life cycle cost (LCC) – are the most promising methodologies for the required evaluation. Based on this, the study aims to optimise passive energy renovation strategies in residential buildings to achieve efficient life cycle carbon reduction and optimal global warming potential (GWP) and cost-efficiency. For this, the research employs the “PARARENOVATE-LCT” tool as a new approach for the parametric enviro-economic evaluation of energy renovation strategies in residential buildings with LCT. As a working methodology, firstly, we define the evaluation scope, case study and life cycle inventory (LCI); secondly, we evaluate each of the 245 scenarios composed by all the combinations of different types of intervention in façade, roof and windows; and thirdly, we conduct the multi-objective optimisation in terms of optimal life cycle GWP reduction and cost-efficiency. The multi-objective optimisation performed by the Pareto method identifies 17 optimal strategies. The results show that the maximum GWP reduction strategies do not coincide with the maximum cost-effectiveness strategies. Therefore, more than half of the GWP can be reduced by some strategy, but with medium cost-effectiveness; however, the strategies with the highest cost-effectiveness reduce around one-third of the climate impact. Graphical Abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43615-024-00499-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimisation of Passive Energy Renovation Strategies in Residential Buildings for Life Cycle Global Warming Potential Reduction and Cost-effectiveness

Markel Arbulu, Xabat Oregi, Lauren Etxepare Igiñiz
2 citations
Circular Economy and Sustainability
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
article

Optimisation of Passive Energy Renovation Strategies in Residential Buildings for Life Cycle Global Warming Potential Reduction and Cost-effectiveness

Markel Arbulu, Xabat Oregi, Lauren Etxepare Igiñiz
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The European Union (EU) regulations claim an efficient evaluation of the building renovation processes, highlighting the quantification of the life cycle carbon and cost-efficiency, towards the carbon-neutrality targets. The integration of the life cycle thinking (LCT) in the environmental field – by the life cycle assessment (LCA) – and in the economic field – by the life cycle cost (LCC) – are the most promising methodologies for the required evaluation. Based on this, the study aims to optimise passive energy renovation strategies in residential buildings to achieve efficient life cycle carbon reduction and optimal global warming potential (GWP) and cost-efficiency. For this, the research employs the “PARARENOVATE-LCT” tool as a new approach for the parametric enviro-economic evaluation of energy renovation strategies in residential buildings with LCT. As a working methodology, firstly, we define the evaluation scope, case study and life cycle inventory (LCI); secondly, we evaluate each of the 245 scenarios composed by all the combinations of different types of intervention in façade, roof and windows; and thirdly, we conduct the multi-objective optimisation in terms of optimal life cycle GWP reduction and cost-efficiency. The multi-objective optimisation performed by the Pareto method identifies 17 optimal strategies. The results show that the maximum GWP reduction strategies do not coincide with the maximum cost-effectiveness strategies. Therefore, more than half of the GWP can be reduced by some strategy, but with medium cost-effectiveness; however, the strategies with the highest cost-effectiveness reduce around one-third of the climate impact. Graphical Abstract

Circular Economy and SustainabilityVol. 5(8)
University of the Basque Country (ES)
Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.