THE EFFECT OF FEATURE SELECTION METHODS ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR BREAST CANCER PREDICTION

Developing countries often face a high incidence of breast cancer, making early detection vital for effective treatment. The risk of developing breast cancer can be evaluated using machine learning methods and regular diagnostic data. In cancer datasets, there is a wealth of patient information, but not all of it is valuable for predicting cancer. This highlights the significance of feature selection methods in uncovering the relevant data. In this field, many studies have attempted to predict the different types of breast tumours, since it is important to diagnose breast cancer medication accurately. This paper aims to perform a comparison such that to show the effect of different feature selection methods on the accuracy of various existing machine learning algorithms. The study focuses on seven machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Neural Network (NN), and Random Forest (RF). The feature selection techniques examined include F-test Feature Selection, Mutual Information (MI), and Spearman Correlation Coefficient. The dataset used for the experiments is the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset, which is publicly available from the UCI Repository. The findings reveal that when feature selection is implemented, the LR and NN algorithms demonstrate superior accuracy and perform exceptionally well across other metrics compared to the other models

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Journal of University of Zakho
Published
2025-02-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25271/sjuoz.2025.13.1.1429
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE EFFECT OF FEATURE SELECTION METHODS ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR BREAST CANCER PREDICTION

Diman Hassan
1 links
Science Journal of University of Zakho
AI in cancer detection
article

THE EFFECT OF FEATURE SELECTION METHODS ON MACHINE LEARNING MODEL PERFORMANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR BREAST CANCER PREDICTION

Diman Hassan
article en

Abstract

Developing countries often face a high incidence of breast cancer, making early detection vital for effective treatment. The risk of developing breast cancer can be evaluated using machine learning methods and regular diagnostic data. In cancer datasets, there is a wealth of patient information, but not all of it is valuable for predicting cancer. This highlights the significance of feature selection methods in uncovering the relevant data. In this field, many studies have attempted to predict the different types of breast tumours, since it is important to diagnose breast cancer medication accurately. This paper aims to perform a comparison such that to show the effect of different feature selection methods on the accuracy of various existing machine learning algorithms. The study focuses on seven machine learning algorithms: K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes (NB), Decision Trees (DT), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Logistic Regression (LR), Neural Network (NN), and Random Forest (RF). The feature selection techniques examined include F-test Feature Selection, Mutual Information (MI), and Spearman Correlation Coefficient. The dataset used for the experiments is the Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer (WDBC) dataset, which is publicly available from the UCI Repository. The findings reveal that when feature selection is implemented, the LR and NN algorithms demonstrate superior accuracy and perform exceptionally well across other metrics compared to the other models

Science Journal of University of ZakhoVol. 13(1)
University of Zakho (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.