A Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Models on Cell-Type Classification Task

This study presents a comprehensive benchmarking of three state-of-the-art single-cell foundation models scGPT, Geneformer, and scFoundation, on cell-type classification tasks. We evaluate the models on three datasets: myeloid, human pancreas, and multiple sclerosis, examining both standard fine-tuning and few-shot learning scenarios. Our work reveals that scFoundation consistently achieves the best performance while Geneformer performs poorly, yielding results sometimes even worse than those of the baseline models. Additionally, we demonstrate that a good foundation model can generalize well even when fine-tuned with out-of-distribution data, a capability that the baseline models lack. Our work highlights the potential of foundation models for addressing challenging biomedical questions, particularly in contexts where models are trained on one population but deployed on another.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701551.3708811
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Models on Cell-Type Classification Task

Soumyadeep Roy, Johanna Schrader, Wolfgang Nejdl, Ming Tang et al.
3 citations
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
2.42
article

A Systematic Evaluation of Single-Cell Foundation Models on Cell-Type Classification Task

Soumyadeep Roy, Johanna Schrader, Wolfgang Nejdl, Ming Tang, Ziteng Li, Nadia Yousfi Steiner, Omid Vosoughi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive benchmarking of three state-of-the-art single-cell foundation models scGPT, Geneformer, and scFoundation, on cell-type classification tasks. We evaluate the models on three datasets: myeloid, human pancreas, and multiple sclerosis, examining both standard fine-tuning and few-shot learning scenarios. Our work reveals that scFoundation consistently achieves the best performance while Geneformer performs poorly, yielding results sometimes even worse than those of the baseline models. Additionally, we demonstrate that a good foundation model can generalize well even when fine-tuned with out-of-distribution data, a capability that the baseline models lack. Our work highlights the potential of foundation models for addressing challenging biomedical questions, particularly in contexts where models are trained on one population but deployed on another.

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN), L3S Research Center (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
2.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.