Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts

Abstract The strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships varies within and across studies, depending on the investigated ecosystem function and diversity facet (e.g., species richness or functional composition), limiting our ability to translate BEF results into recommendations for management and conservation. The variability in BEF relationships is particularly high when considering complex multitrophic communities and can be explained by food web contexts. Here we examine how different plant diversity facets affect biomass stocks and energy flows of each trophic group depending on their position in the trophic network. We used coupled aboveground–belowground multitrophic networks of energy dynamics, assembled across the experimental gradients of grassland plant species richness, functional diversity, and presence of plant functional groups. We compared the strengths of these diversity effects between trophic groups, trophic levels, aboveground versus belowground subnetworks, and types of ecosystem functions. Plant species richness, functional trait diversity, and the presence of legumes and grasses were influential drivers of ecosystem energetics. The effects of plant species richness across the food web often operated through mechanisms of plant functional‐trait diversity. The effects of plant species richness attenuated across trophic levels. Legume presence strengthened the top‐down control (predation) of primary consumers. We found an overall mismatch in the strength of diversity effects on flows versus stocks. Some trophic groups showed even contrasting direction in responses of their stocks and flows to plant diversity. This indicates that plant diversity constrains consumer functioning by means other than only altered consumer biomass. Responses of flows and stocks to plant diversity differed between trophic groups, and aboveground versus belowground parts. Individual stocks and energy flows were responsive to different biodiversity facets, highlighting the importance of the explicit consideration of individual functions and diversity facets for a comprehensive multitrophic understanding. For example, legume presence increased aboveground processes but reduced plant carbon uptake and belowground plant production. Plant communities containing legumes lost more biomass to herbivores, had faster decomposition, and channeled less energy to soil detritus. An important implication of these results is that targeted grassland management would profit from focusing on specific plant diversity facets depending on the ecosystem function or service of interest.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Monographs
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.70004
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts

Oksana Y. Buzhdygan, Stuart R. Borrett, Bernhard Schmid, Nico Eisenhauer et al.
3 citations
Ecological Monographs
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
article

Plant diversity facets differentially affect energy dynamics in grasslands depending on trophic contexts

Oksana Y. Buzhdygan, Stuart R. Borrett, Bernhard Schmid, Nico Eisenhauer, Jes Hines, Britta Tietjen, Jana S. Petermann, Sebastian T. Meyer, Christoph Scherber, Nina C. Buchmann, Anne Ebeling, Selina Baldauf, Wolfgang W. Weisser, Hans de Kroon
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The strength of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning (BEF) relationships varies within and across studies, depending on the investigated ecosystem function and diversity facet (e.g., species richness or functional composition), limiting our ability to translate BEF results into recommendations for management and conservation. The variability in BEF relationships is particularly high when considering complex multitrophic communities and can be explained by food web contexts. Here we examine how different plant diversity facets affect biomass stocks and energy flows of each trophic group depending on their position in the trophic network. We used coupled aboveground–belowground multitrophic networks of energy dynamics, assembled across the experimental gradients of grassland plant species richness, functional diversity, and presence of plant functional groups. We compared the strengths of these diversity effects between trophic groups, trophic levels, aboveground versus belowground subnetworks, and types of ecosystem functions. Plant species richness, functional trait diversity, and the presence of legumes and grasses were influential drivers of ecosystem energetics. The effects of plant species richness across the food web often operated through mechanisms of plant functional‐trait diversity. The effects of plant species richness attenuated across trophic levels. Legume presence strengthened the top‐down control (predation) of primary consumers. We found an overall mismatch in the strength of diversity effects on flows versus stocks. Some trophic groups showed even contrasting direction in responses of their stocks and flows to plant diversity. This indicates that plant diversity constrains consumer functioning by means other than only altered consumer biomass. Responses of flows and stocks to plant diversity differed between trophic groups, and aboveground versus belowground parts. Individual stocks and energy flows were responsive to different biodiversity facets, highlighting the importance of the explicit consideration of individual functions and diversity facets for a comprehensive multitrophic understanding. For example, legume presence increased aboveground processes but reduced plant carbon uptake and belowground plant production. Plant communities containing legumes lost more biomass to herbivores, had faster decomposition, and channeled less energy to soil detritus. An important implication of these results is that targeted grassland management would profit from focusing on specific plant diversity facets depending on the ecosystem function or service of interest.

Ecological MonographsVol. 95(1)
Social Science Research Council (US), University of Bonn (DE), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of North Carolina Wilmington (US), Duke University (US), University of Salzburg (AT), University of Zurich (CH), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), ETH Zurich (CH), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (DE), Berlin Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research (DE), Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Freie Universität Berlin
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
6.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.