Counter-Factual Hidden Event Detection: A Proof of Concept Using Machine Learning in Time Series

We propose a new framework for detecting hidden events based on historical data from previous events and related time series data that are known (or presumed) to be affected by the event. In particular, a forecasting model of the time-series data is trained using known occurrences of the hidden events. Then, for a given time interval where a hidden event may have occurred, the time series is forecasted under various hypotheses, including the hidden event happening (possibly at various time intervals) and not happening. The resulting forecasts are compared with the actual time series for the interval where the event would have had its maximum effect, and the hypothesis that leads to a forecast closest to the actual data is selected. The methodology is evaluated under two scenarios. The performance of the methodology is satisfactory in both cases, showing its potential for hidden event detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/synasc65383.2024.00053
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counter-Factual Hidden Event Detection: A Proof of Concept Using Machine Learning in Time Series

Ruxandra Stoean, Carlos Cano-Domingo, Manuel Soler‐Ortiz, Manuel Lcópez-Ibáñez
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

Counter-Factual Hidden Event Detection: A Proof of Concept Using Machine Learning in Time Series

Ruxandra Stoean, Carlos Cano-Domingo, Manuel Soler‐Ortiz, Manuel Lcópez-Ibáñez
article en

Abstract

We propose a new framework for detecting hidden events based on historical data from previous events and related time series data that are known (or presumed) to be affected by the event. In particular, a forecasting model of the time-series data is trained using known occurrences of the hidden events. Then, for a given time interval where a hidden event may have occurred, the time series is forecasted under various hypotheses, including the hidden event happening (possibly at various time intervals) and not happening. The resulting forecasts are compared with the actual time series for the interval where the event would have had its maximum effect, and the hypothesis that leads to a forecast closest to the actual data is selected. The methodology is evaluated under two scenarios. The performance of the methodology is satisfactory in both cases, showing its potential for hidden event detection.

University of Manchester (GB), University of Almería (ES), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (ES), University of Craiova (RO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Counter-Factual Hidden Event Detection: A Proof of Concept Using Machine Learning in Time Series — Ruxandra Stoean, Carlos Cano-Domingo, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS