Integrating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning Networks for Brain Tumor Classification

This study evaluated the performance of MobileNetV2 and ResNet50 deep learning networks for brain tumor detection and classification using MRI scans. The research examined four data splitting ratios: 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10, across 8 different scenarios. The classification task focused on four brain tumor categories: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumors, and non-tumorous cases. The numerical results indicate that MobileNetV2 outperformed ResNet50 in classification efficacy and it demonstrated better CPU time efficiency. Both models maintained high overall classification accuracy, even with minor performance decreases as training dataset sizes increased. Notably, the 70/30 ratio for MobileNetV2 proved sufficiently effective for the given classification task as it demonstrates all performance metrics more than 95% and reasonable computational time. The study emphasizes the importance of effectively classifying brain tumor types for early identification, precise diagnosis, and tailored treatment planning. The promising results suggest that these deep learning models, particularly when optimized, can significantly contribute to improving patient outcomes in brain tumor management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/bmeicon64021.2024.10896328
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning Networks for Brain Tumor Classification

Pichit Boonkrong, Suejit Pechprasarn, Sasipatcha Hanmanop, Tatpol Jongsiri et al.
2 citations
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.49
article

Integrating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning Networks for Brain Tumor Classification

Pichit Boonkrong, Suejit Pechprasarn, Sasipatcha Hanmanop, Tatpol Jongsiri, Manatsanan Khongtan, Sasithorn Tengjongdee, Chanapa Chaitan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of MobileNetV2 and ResNet50 deep learning networks for brain tumor detection and classification using MRI scans. The research examined four data splitting ratios: 60/40, 70/30, 80/20, and 90/10, across 8 different scenarios. The classification task focused on four brain tumor categories: glioma, meningioma, pituitary tumors, and non-tumorous cases. The numerical results indicate that MobileNetV2 outperformed ResNet50 in classification efficacy and it demonstrated better CPU time efficiency. Both models maintained high overall classification accuracy, even with minor performance decreases as training dataset sizes increased. Notably, the 70/30 ratio for MobileNetV2 proved sufficiently effective for the given classification task as it demonstrates all performance metrics more than 95% and reasonable computational time. The study emphasizes the importance of effectively classifying brain tumor types for early identification, precise diagnosis, and tailored treatment planning. The promising results suggest that these deep learning models, particularly when optimized, can significantly contribute to improving patient outcomes in brain tumor management.

Rangsit University (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Deep Learning Networks for Brain Tumor Classification — Pichit Boonkrong, Suejit Pechprasarn, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS