Work in Progress: Exploring Epistemic Identity to Support How Engineering Education Research Teams Negotiate Epistemic Differences

This work-in-progress research paper describes the epistemic identity of one researcher, Dr. Roberts, working on an interdisciplinary engineering education research team. Engineering education research is an interdisciplinary field that includes researchers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds who each bring their own approaches to the generation, expression, and application of knowledge. These different epistemic identities can lead to tensions that prevent teams from having their desired impact. Our data includes a transcript from a 60-minute semi-structured interview. During the interview, we asked questions to explore specific aspects of Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity, the approaches he used to navigate differences in thinking, and instances of epistemic negotiation in the research team meetings. This data was analyzed using an open coding process defined by Charmaz (2014) followed by the construction of a memo to describe Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity. We describe the results from our initial analysis of Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893326
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Work in Progress: Exploring Epistemic Identity to Support How Engineering Education Research Teams Negotiate Epistemic Differences

Lorna Treffert, Courtney Faber
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

Work in Progress: Exploring Epistemic Identity to Support How Engineering Education Research Teams Negotiate Epistemic Differences

Lorna Treffert, Courtney Faber
article en

Abstract

This work-in-progress research paper describes the epistemic identity of one researcher, Dr. Roberts, working on an interdisciplinary engineering education research team. Engineering education research is an interdisciplinary field that includes researchers from a range of disciplinary backgrounds who each bring their own approaches to the generation, expression, and application of knowledge. These different epistemic identities can lead to tensions that prevent teams from having their desired impact. Our data includes a transcript from a 60-minute semi-structured interview. During the interview, we asked questions to explore specific aspects of Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity, the approaches he used to navigate differences in thinking, and instances of epistemic negotiation in the research team meetings. This data was analyzed using an open coding process defined by Charmaz (2014) followed by the construction of a memo to describe Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity. We describe the results from our initial analysis of Dr. Roberts' epistemic identity.

University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.