WIP: An Alternative Grading Scheme in a Graduate Disciplinary Engineering Course

This work-in-progress innovative practice paper describes the implementation and initial evaluation of a graduate course that has been redesigned to integrate principles of mastery and specifications grading. The target course was a graduate Advanced Thermodynamics of Solids course, a required course for students in the Materials Science and Engineering graduate program. Previously, the course used a traditional grading scheme, where students' grades were assigned based on weighted performance on homework, exams, and other projects. In 2022, the instructor redesigned the course to base students' grades on their achievement of minimum grading thresholds for each assessment category. Using virtual tokens, students could repeat assignments (including homework and midterm exam problems). Interviews with five students were conducted and initial feedback was that the unweighted grading scheme did not motivate them, although several students appreciated the ability to retake exam questions. This paper also discusses instructor reflections and insight into future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893152
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WIP: An Alternative Grading Scheme in a Graduate Disciplinary Engineering Course

Susan Gentry
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
article

WIP: An Alternative Grading Scheme in a Graduate Disciplinary Engineering Course

Susan Gentry
article en

Abstract

This work-in-progress innovative practice paper describes the implementation and initial evaluation of a graduate course that has been redesigned to integrate principles of mastery and specifications grading. The target course was a graduate Advanced Thermodynamics of Solids course, a required course for students in the Materials Science and Engineering graduate program. Previously, the course used a traditional grading scheme, where students' grades were assigned based on weighted performance on homework, exams, and other projects. In 2022, the instructor redesigned the course to base students' grades on their achievement of minimum grading thresholds for each assessment category. Using virtual tokens, students could repeat assignments (including homework and midterm exam problems). Interviews with five students were conducted and initial feedback was that the unweighted grading scheme did not motivate them, although several students appreciated the ability to retake exam questions. This paper also discusses instructor reflections and insight into future work.

University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.