Enabling Computer Science Students to Choose Their Own Adventure in a Mandatory and Curricular Challenge-Based Learning Course

This research-to-practice full paper describes the results we got from enabling students to fine-tune their own learning experience in a Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) course. Engineering educators have been working for several years on how best to integrate CBL into computing courses, recognizing CBL's role in fostering crucial skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. At FIE 2023, we proposed a possible scaffold named “Choose Your Own Adventure in Challenge-Based Learning” (CYOA-CBL) that aimed to make CBL more adaptable and empower the students to personalise their experience, positioning themselves in a spectrum ranging from a more open and creative approach to a more structured and guided CBL experience. During the past academic year, we implemented CYOA-CBL in a mandatory four-month course at a medium-sized European university. With this work, we present the results we got from a qualitative study where we used mixed methods of data collection to evaluate CYOA-CBL and verify whether students understood the course process. In this paper, we discuss how students tended to adopt both open and structured approach and they appreciated the flexible nature of the course, leveraging the opportunity to change their path during the process to adapt it to their challenges. Students also valued the recurring structure of CYOA-CBL mentoring and tutorials and they had a general good understanding of the “next steps” to perform. At the same time, they highlighted the need to improve the tutorials, even if in a controversial way.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893335
Primary Topic
Biomedical and Engineering Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enabling Computer Science Students to Choose Their Own Adventure in a Mandatory and Curricular Challenge-Based Learning Course

Lorenzo Angeli, Maurizio Marchese, Jessica Lucchetta, Milena Stoycheva et al.
Biomedical and Engineering Education
article

Enabling Computer Science Students to Choose Their Own Adventure in a Mandatory and Curricular Challenge-Based Learning Course

Lorenzo Angeli, Maurizio Marchese, Jessica Lucchetta, Milena Stoycheva, Stefano Turrini
article en

Abstract

This research-to-practice full paper describes the results we got from enabling students to fine-tune their own learning experience in a Challenge-Based Learning (CBL) course. Engineering educators have been working for several years on how best to integrate CBL into computing courses, recognizing CBL's role in fostering crucial skills such as critical thinking and problem-solving. At FIE 2023, we proposed a possible scaffold named “Choose Your Own Adventure in Challenge-Based Learning” (CYOA-CBL) that aimed to make CBL more adaptable and empower the students to personalise their experience, positioning themselves in a spectrum ranging from a more open and creative approach to a more structured and guided CBL experience. During the past academic year, we implemented CYOA-CBL in a mandatory four-month course at a medium-sized European university. With this work, we present the results we got from a qualitative study where we used mixed methods of data collection to evaluate CYOA-CBL and verify whether students understood the course process. In this paper, we discuss how students tended to adopt both open and structured approach and they appreciated the flexible nature of the course, leveraging the opportunity to change their path during the process to adapt it to their challenges. Students also valued the recurring structure of CYOA-CBL mentoring and tutorials and they had a general good understanding of the “next steps” to perform. At the same time, they highlighted the need to improve the tutorials, even if in a controversial way.

University of Trento (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Biomedical and Engineering Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.