WIP: Generative vs. Traditional Computer-Aided Design-How Design Tools Impact CAD Artifact Quality

This work-in-progress research paper explores the effects of generative AI design tools on engineering students' design artifacts during computer-aided design (CAD) tasks with the objective to better understand the impact of emergent design tools on design artifacts to better inform the development of curriculum surrounding generative design. Our research explored the question: to what extent does engaging in generative design produce a different quality artifact as compared to traditional design? This study utilized a mixed methods approach to compare students' <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\mathrm{n}=20)$</tex> CAD artifact quality between two separate tasks; one completed with traditional parametric modeling and the other with generative design tools. Preliminary findings indicate that students produced a significantly higher quality design artifact using generative design as compared to artifacts created using traditional parametric methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10892999
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WIP: Generative vs. Traditional Computer-Aided Design-How Design Tools Impact CAD Artifact Quality

Andrew C. Hall, Molly Goldstein
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

WIP: Generative vs. Traditional Computer-Aided Design-How Design Tools Impact CAD Artifact Quality

Andrew C. Hall, Molly Goldstein
article en

Abstract

This work-in-progress research paper explores the effects of generative AI design tools on engineering students' design artifacts during computer-aided design (CAD) tasks with the objective to better understand the impact of emergent design tools on design artifacts to better inform the development of curriculum surrounding generative design. Our research explored the question: to what extent does engaging in generative design produce a different quality artifact as compared to traditional design? This study utilized a mixed methods approach to compare students' <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$(\mathrm{n}=20)$</tex> CAD artifact quality between two separate tasks; one completed with traditional parametric modeling and the other with generative design tools. Preliminary findings indicate that students produced a significantly higher quality design artifact using generative design as compared to artifacts created using traditional parametric methods.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.