WIP: Engineering Class Students' Epistemic Cognition when Interacting with Generative AI

This work in progress belongs to the innovative practice category. Nowadays, generative AI (also known as GenAI) can produce novel data samples that closely resemble authentic datasets. The advent of large language models (LLMs), in particular, has caused a huge interest in utilizing GenAI within and beyond the realm of higher education. However, little about engineering students' views and behaviours related to knowing and knowledge when using GenAI, such as ChatGPT, is known. In this WIP, we have engaged a class of N = 37 engineering students taking a postgraduate course titled “Social Media Analytics”. They were required to write essays related to their course learning in the form of blog posts. They were required to use LLM tools, such as ChatGPT, to assist their writing processes. Their GenAI usage was guided by the cognitive-agent approach, Search Tree, Analyze and Repair, and Selection (STARS), while STARS was proposed by Kirk et al. in AAAI 2024 to extend and complement prompt engineering. In addition, the participants were invited to fill in the Epistemic Cognition Inventory (ECI) questionnaire to associate five aspects of epistemic cognition (EC) with their writing experience. It is confirmed in our results that students' EC, i.e., their beliefs related to knowledge and knowing, significantly predict their prompting engagement and academic performance. However, students' academic performance is found to be significantly and negatively associated with their preference for GenAI usage. Here, we have uncovered engineering students' EC when interacting with generative AI, an area where little has been known so far. Our findings also suggest that proper use of GenAI prompting might promote engineering students' EC and, therefore, engineering learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893501
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WIP: Engineering Class Students' Epistemic Cognition when Interacting with Generative AI

Morris Siu–Yung Jong, Y. Zhang, Rosanna Yuen-Yan Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan et al.
2 citations
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
article

WIP: Engineering Class Students' Epistemic Cognition when Interacting with Generative AI

Morris Siu–Yung Jong, Y. Zhang, Rosanna Yuen-Yan Chan, Cecilia Ka Yuk Chan, Zihao Hu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This work in progress belongs to the innovative practice category. Nowadays, generative AI (also known as GenAI) can produce novel data samples that closely resemble authentic datasets. The advent of large language models (LLMs), in particular, has caused a huge interest in utilizing GenAI within and beyond the realm of higher education. However, little about engineering students' views and behaviours related to knowing and knowledge when using GenAI, such as ChatGPT, is known. In this WIP, we have engaged a class of N = 37 engineering students taking a postgraduate course titled “Social Media Analytics”. They were required to write essays related to their course learning in the form of blog posts. They were required to use LLM tools, such as ChatGPT, to assist their writing processes. Their GenAI usage was guided by the cognitive-agent approach, Search Tree, Analyze and Repair, and Selection (STARS), while STARS was proposed by Kirk et al. in AAAI 2024 to extend and complement prompt engineering. In addition, the participants were invited to fill in the Epistemic Cognition Inventory (ECI) questionnaire to associate five aspects of epistemic cognition (EC) with their writing experience. It is confirmed in our results that students' EC, i.e., their beliefs related to knowledge and knowing, significantly predict their prompting engagement and academic performance. However, students' academic performance is found to be significantly and negatively associated with their preference for GenAI usage. Here, we have uncovered engineering students' EC when interacting with generative AI, an area where little has been known so far. Our findings also suggest that proper use of GenAI prompting might promote engineering students' EC and, therefore, engineering learning.

Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
4.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.