WIP: Comparing Engineering and Humanities Student Approaches to Complex Problem Solving
This work-in-progress research paper contributes new insights into the qualitative differences in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches between engineering and humanities students in a scenario-based complex problem. We interviewed 14 undergraduate students at Purdue University, comparing their levels of complexity in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches. The first round of coding suggested that students' academic disciplines had some impact on the complexity of their problem-solving approaches. We are currently conducting a second round of indepth analysis to understand what types of educational experiences encourage systems thinking. The results can inform the development of engineering courses that aim to develop systems thinking.
Authors
- Jorge Samuel Mendez Quiroga
- Kirsten Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-5587)
- Mengzhou Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2212-443X)
- Lori Czerwionka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9637-831X)
Institutions
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893524
- Primary Topic
- Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Endowment for the Humanities