WIP: Comparing Engineering and Humanities Student Approaches to Complex Problem Solving

This work-in-progress research paper contributes new insights into the qualitative differences in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches between engineering and humanities students in a scenario-based complex problem. We interviewed 14 undergraduate students at Purdue University, comparing their levels of complexity in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches. The first round of coding suggested that students' academic disciplines had some impact on the complexity of their problem-solving approaches. We are currently conducting a second round of indepth analysis to understand what types of educational experiences encourage systems thinking. The results can inform the development of engineering courses that aim to develop systems thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893524
Primary Topic
Education and Critical Thinking Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WIP: Comparing Engineering and Humanities Student Approaches to Complex Problem Solving

Jorge Samuel Mendez Quiroga, Kirsten Davis, Mengzhou Chen, Lori Czerwionka
Education and Critical Thinking Development
article

WIP: Comparing Engineering and Humanities Student Approaches to Complex Problem Solving

Jorge Samuel Mendez Quiroga, Kirsten Davis, Mengzhou Chen, Lori Czerwionka
article en

Abstract

This work-in-progress research paper contributes new insights into the qualitative differences in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches between engineering and humanities students in a scenario-based complex problem. We interviewed 14 undergraduate students at Purdue University, comparing their levels of complexity in conceptualization and problem-solving approaches. The first round of coding suggested that students' academic disciplines had some impact on the complexity of their problem-solving approaches. We are currently conducting a second round of indepth analysis to understand what types of educational experiences encourage systems thinking. The results can inform the development of engineering courses that aim to develop systems thinking.

Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
National Endowment for the Humanities
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Education and Critical Thinking Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.