Student Valuations for Opportunity-Based Education
This research-to-practice paper describes an experiment designed to understand educational opportunities valued by students. Engineering education has, since the advent of ABET's EC-2000, operated using an outcomes-based paradigm predominantly focused on preparing engineers for the workforce. Engineering departments create curricula based on this paradigm that are more rigid than most other disciplines, thereby limiting the opportunities students have to explore beyond established curricular boundaries. The outcome-based paradigm limits students' agency in engineering education to pursue growth in unique, individual ways. Recognizing these challenges, the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at Bucknell University is adapting Amartya Sen's Capability Approach, which emphasizes student agency. In contrast to top-down approaches to curriculum design that focus narrowly on students' mastery of defined content areas, we focus on enabling students to develop the abilities needed to live a life aligned with their values. Rather than ensuring students achieve mandated outcomes, the focus is on providing opportunities, which students actively choose to transform into achievements. This study sought to better understand the opportunities that students value. The department first created a capabilities list that classified several opportunities that are of potential importance in engineering education. To gather feedback from students in the department, we offered two focus groups to discuss our capabilities list and a follow-up survey to formally elicit student valuation of capabilities. In addition, we offered an experimental course that promoted an opportunity-based engineering education model that nurtures both academic and personal growth. Student reflections from this class were analyzed using inductive coding with multiple coders, categorizing portions of students' reflections that align with our capabilities list. This study reveals the opportunities students highly regard to be better equipped to live a life they value.
Authors
- Stewart J. Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5554-1475)
- Michael Thompson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3444-8503)
- Sarah Appelhans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7313-3504)
- Alan Cheville (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0879-3706)
- R.L. Thomas (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2426-4759)
Institutions
- Bucknell University (US)
- Lafayette College (US)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2024-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893129
- Primary Topic
- Regional Development and Policy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Science Foundation