“Let the Designing Begin!”: Teacher Tendencies Supporting Efficient Facilitation of the Engineering Design Process

This research full paper utilizes qualitative methods to explore middle school engineering teachers' facilitation of the engineering design process as they implement STEM-integrated curricula. Engineering teachers face the challenge of guiding students through a multi-phase, iterative process to design, prototype, and test solutions to engineering problems. In our research exploring middle school teachers' implementation of the semester-long STEM-ID curricula, we have found considerable variation in the degree to which teachers successfully work with students to navigate the engineering design process (EDP). Some teachers have been able to guide students through the EDP to complete STEM-ID challenges efficiently, whereas other teachers have struggled to do so. To better understand the problem of practice evidenced by such variations in the efficiency of EDP facilitation, this qualitative study synthesizes observation and interview data to identify tendencies characterizing efficient facilitation of the EDP among teachers implementing the STEM-ID curricula. In the current study, which focused on curricula implementation by six engineering teachers, four teachers demonstrated efficient facilitation of EDP, successfully guiding students through the vast majority of the curricula's design challenges, while two teachers struggled to do so. Our qualitative data suggest three major tendencies that may account for variations in the efficiency with which teachers guided students through the various stages of the EDP: 1) adept management of student groups working at multiple stages of EDP, 2)explicit discussion of EDP progress and documentation in engineering design process logs, and 3) engaging students in discussions about the purpose of engineering and the engineering design process, including beyond the design challenges they complete as part of the STEM-ID curricula. By identifying tendencies we observed among teachers who efficiently implemented the EDP, we hope to advance the field's understanding of strategies that support student engagement in the EDP while also informing future engineering curricula and professional development projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893000
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Let the Designing Begin!”: Teacher Tendencies Supporting Efficient Facilitation of the Engineering Design Process

Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Abeera P. Rehmat, Sunni Newton, Meltem Alemdar et al.
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
article

“Let the Designing Begin!”: Teacher Tendencies Supporting Efficient Facilitation of the Engineering Design Process

Dyanne Baptiste Porter, Abeera P. Rehmat, Sunni Newton, Meltem Alemdar, Jessica Gale, Jasmine Choi
article en

Abstract

This research full paper utilizes qualitative methods to explore middle school engineering teachers' facilitation of the engineering design process as they implement STEM-integrated curricula. Engineering teachers face the challenge of guiding students through a multi-phase, iterative process to design, prototype, and test solutions to engineering problems. In our research exploring middle school teachers' implementation of the semester-long STEM-ID curricula, we have found considerable variation in the degree to which teachers successfully work with students to navigate the engineering design process (EDP). Some teachers have been able to guide students through the EDP to complete STEM-ID challenges efficiently, whereas other teachers have struggled to do so. To better understand the problem of practice evidenced by such variations in the efficiency of EDP facilitation, this qualitative study synthesizes observation and interview data to identify tendencies characterizing efficient facilitation of the EDP among teachers implementing the STEM-ID curricula. In the current study, which focused on curricula implementation by six engineering teachers, four teachers demonstrated efficient facilitation of EDP, successfully guiding students through the vast majority of the curricula's design challenges, while two teachers struggled to do so. Our qualitative data suggest three major tendencies that may account for variations in the efficiency with which teachers guided students through the various stages of the EDP: 1) adept management of student groups working at multiple stages of EDP, 2)explicit discussion of EDP progress and documentation in engineering design process logs, and 3) engaging students in discussions about the purpose of engineering and the engineering design process, including beyond the design challenges they complete as part of the STEM-ID curricula. By identifying tendencies we observed among teachers who efficiently implemented the EDP, we hope to advance the field's understanding of strategies that support student engagement in the EDP while also informing future engineering curricula and professional development projects.

Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.