Late or Not Late - Student Perception of Performance, Confidence, and Sense of Belonging When Late Submission Is Accepted

In this research full paper, we report on the results of a large-scale study to answer the following research question: What is the impact of the late submission practice on students' perception of their sense of belonging, confidence, and performance, their actual performance in the course, and other experiences in their course?; Does the impact differ by different socioeconomic, and demographic student groups (e.g. ethnicity/race, gender, first-generation, transfer-student status, work status, etc.), and whether students utilized or did not utilize the practice? Being intentional in fostering an environment where diverse groups of students can thrive in a discipline can contribute to increasing diversity in the corresponding workforce. This is especially true for fields like Computer Science and Engineering where lack of diversity continues to be a major challenge. One way to broaden participation and increase student success is the adoption of equitable pedagogical and grading practices. In this paper, we describe students' perception of performance, confidence, and sense of belonging (SoB) when they are permitted to submit coursework past a set deadline. We report on the data in the context of the different student groups outlined above. Our hypothesis is that such practice contributes to improved student performance by focusing on learning rather than grades. Our results show that students highly valued this practice and provided a 4+ rating on a 5-point Likert scale, indicating a positive perception and more specifically perceived them as having a positive impact on their SoB, confidence, and performance. This practice also helped in improving students' course performances. This work will help in understanding the empirical evidence of the impact of this practice on student experiences across various student groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10893379
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diverse Music Education Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Late or Not Late - Student Perception of Performance, Confidence, and Sense of Belonging When Late Submission Is Accepted

Nadia Najjar, Debarati Basu, Kaitlyn Gosline
1 citations
Diverse Music Education Insights
5.21
article

Late or Not Late - Student Perception of Performance, Confidence, and Sense of Belonging When Late Submission Is Accepted

Nadia Najjar, Debarati Basu, Kaitlyn Gosline
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this research full paper, we report on the results of a large-scale study to answer the following research question: What is the impact of the late submission practice on students' perception of their sense of belonging, confidence, and performance, their actual performance in the course, and other experiences in their course?; Does the impact differ by different socioeconomic, and demographic student groups (e.g. ethnicity/race, gender, first-generation, transfer-student status, work status, etc.), and whether students utilized or did not utilize the practice? Being intentional in fostering an environment where diverse groups of students can thrive in a discipline can contribute to increasing diversity in the corresponding workforce. This is especially true for fields like Computer Science and Engineering where lack of diversity continues to be a major challenge. One way to broaden participation and increase student success is the adoption of equitable pedagogical and grading practices. In this paper, we describe students' perception of performance, confidence, and sense of belonging (SoB) when they are permitted to submit coursework past a set deadline. We report on the data in the context of the different student groups outlined above. Our hypothesis is that such practice contributes to improved student performance by focusing on learning rather than grades. Our results show that students highly valued this practice and provided a 4+ rating on a 5-point Likert scale, indicating a positive perception and more specifically perceived them as having a positive impact on their SoB, confidence, and performance. This practice also helped in improving students' course performances. This work will help in understanding the empirical evidence of the impact of this practice on student experiences across various student groups.

University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Diverse Music Education Insights
5.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.