Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students' Definitions of Mental Health

This full research paper describes undergraduate students' definitions of mental health in order to advance understanding about what the term ‘mental health’ means to undergraduate engineering students. Recent studies have called attention to the worsening mental health amongst college students, particularly engineering students. Studies have connected these worsening mental health conditions to the high-stress culture of engineering. However, most research approaches mental health from its clinical definition, most often using established instruments to look for stress, anxiety, and depression among undergraduate students. At the same time, ‘mental health’ has been increasingly used colloquially by students in less clinical ways. In order to gain qualitatively rich understandings of how engineering students' mental health is impacted by the culture of undergraduate engineering, we must understand what students mean when they say, ‘mental health.’ This paper draws on a larger research study that interviewed 21 undergraduate engineering students about their mental health and experiences in engineering. Participants are from one comprehensive, research-intensive university in the Midwest, and all participants hold at least one identity that has been historically marginalized in engineering (e.g., gender, race, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation). This paper focuses on students' answers to the interview question: “How do you define mental health? What does mental health mean to you?” We pose the research question: How do undergraduate engineering students define mental health? We draw on Braun & Clarke's (2022) reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes that describe students' definitions of mental health. The results of this work are expected to add to the ongoing conversation about the mental health of undergraduate engineering students. Moreover, this work will open new avenues for qualitatively exploring the mental health of undergraduate engineering students from a more holistic lens, which will add to ongoing research that adopts a clinical lens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fie61694.2024.10892986
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students' Definitions of Mental Health

Emily Fitzpatrick, Jessica Deters, Nosakhare Idiaghe, Chloe Mann
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Exploring Undergraduate Engineering Students' Definitions of Mental Health

Emily Fitzpatrick, Jessica Deters, Nosakhare Idiaghe, Chloe Mann
article en

Abstract

This full research paper describes undergraduate students' definitions of mental health in order to advance understanding about what the term ‘mental health’ means to undergraduate engineering students. Recent studies have called attention to the worsening mental health amongst college students, particularly engineering students. Studies have connected these worsening mental health conditions to the high-stress culture of engineering. However, most research approaches mental health from its clinical definition, most often using established instruments to look for stress, anxiety, and depression among undergraduate students. At the same time, ‘mental health’ has been increasingly used colloquially by students in less clinical ways. In order to gain qualitatively rich understandings of how engineering students' mental health is impacted by the culture of undergraduate engineering, we must understand what students mean when they say, ‘mental health.’ This paper draws on a larger research study that interviewed 21 undergraduate engineering students about their mental health and experiences in engineering. Participants are from one comprehensive, research-intensive university in the Midwest, and all participants hold at least one identity that has been historically marginalized in engineering (e.g., gender, race, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation). This paper focuses on students' answers to the interview question: “How do you define mental health? What does mental health mean to you?” We pose the research question: How do undergraduate engineering students define mental health? We draw on Braun & Clarke's (2022) reflexive thematic analysis to generate themes that describe students' definitions of mental health. The results of this work are expected to add to the ongoing conversation about the mental health of undergraduate engineering students. Moreover, this work will open new avenues for qualitatively exploring the mental health of undergraduate engineering students from a more holistic lens, which will add to ongoing research that adopts a clinical lens.

University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.