Classification of Gait Phases Using a Shank-Mounted Single IMU Sensor

Human gait parameters reflect physical and psychological health. Gait impairments hinder daily activities and mobility, particularly in those with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. While methods for estimating temporal parameters exist, there remains a need for a portable, user-friendly, and cost-effective gait analysis device. Therefore, in this study, a feature engineering-based portable gait characterization module is proposed, and a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) is utilized for gait phases (GPs) and event detection. The efficiency of the developed module was assessed using data collected from ten healthy subjects walking on a flat surface. A force-sensing resistor (FSR)-equipped instrumented insole was used as a reference system to validate the results obtained from the developed module. The performance is estimated using three different classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). For gait event (GE) identifications, the average classification accuracies depicted by SVM, LDA, and KNN classifiers are 95.69% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 5.23$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, 96.64% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 5.02$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, and 93.63% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 4.84$ </tex-math></inline-formula>% (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\lt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), respectively. In summary, the GEs and gait temporal parameters are reliably estimated using a single IMU with SVM or LDA classifier (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\gt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). Additionally, the efficacy of the proposed model for sensor location and subject variability has been evaluated. The performance of LDA and SVM classifier for GP prediction has been found to be invariant (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\gt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) toward sensor location and subject variability. Future work will explore diverse walking conditions and test the module on individuals with gait impairments to evaluate its robustness and clinical applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Sensors Journal
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2025.3538983
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Gait Recognition and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classification of Gait Phases Using a Shank-Mounted Single IMU Sensor

Manvir Bhatia, Amit Bhongade, Tapan Kumar Gandhi, Prathosh AP et al.
4 citations
IEEE Sensors Journal
Gait Recognition and Analysis
2.70
article

Classification of Gait Phases Using a Shank-Mounted Single IMU Sensor

Manvir Bhatia, Amit Bhongade, Tapan Kumar Gandhi, Prathosh AP, Rohit Gupta
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Human gait parameters reflect physical and psychological health. Gait impairments hinder daily activities and mobility, particularly in those with neurological or musculoskeletal disorders. While methods for estimating temporal parameters exist, there remains a need for a portable, user-friendly, and cost-effective gait analysis device. Therefore, in this study, a feature engineering-based portable gait characterization module is proposed, and a shank-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) is utilized for gait phases (GPs) and event detection. The efficiency of the developed module was assessed using data collected from ten healthy subjects walking on a flat surface. A force-sensing resistor (FSR)-equipped instrumented insole was used as a reference system to validate the results obtained from the developed module. The performance is estimated using three different classifiers: support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). For gait event (GE) identifications, the average classification accuracies depicted by SVM, LDA, and KNN classifiers are 95.69% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 5.23$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, 96.64% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 5.02$ </tex-math></inline-formula>%, and 93.63% <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\pm \; 4.84$ </tex-math></inline-formula>% (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\lt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>), respectively. In summary, the GEs and gait temporal parameters are reliably estimated using a single IMU with SVM or LDA classifier (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\gt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>). Additionally, the efficacy of the proposed model for sensor location and subject variability has been evaluated. The performance of LDA and SVM classifier for GP prediction has been found to be invariant (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${p}\text {-value}\gt {0.05}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>) toward sensor location and subject variability. Future work will explore diverse walking conditions and test the module on individuals with gait impairments to evaluate its robustness and clinical applicability.

IEEE Sensors JournalVol. 25(8)
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Indian Institute of Science Bangalore (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Gait Recognition and Analysis
2.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.