Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study

Evidence regarding the associations between co-exposure to multiple metals and diabetes risk was scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk using multiple statistical methods. This cross-sectional study included 192 diabetic patients and 189 healthy subjects. We employed inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the plasma concentrations of 18 metals. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were applied to evaluate associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk comprehensively. These models consistently suggested that aluminium and selenium were positively associated with diabetes risk, while manganese, rubidium, and lead were negatively associated with diabetes risk. Age-specific differences of selenium and sex-specific differences of manganese in diabetes risk were also observed based on stratified analyses. According to RCS analyses, we obtained dose-response relationships between metals and diabetes risk:(1) there were inverted U-shaped associations of plasma aluminium and selenium with diabetes risk, with the threshold close to 20.5µg/L and 75.9µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (2) There were L-shaped associations of rubidium and lead with diabetes risk, with the turning point close to 144.5µg/L and 2.5µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (3) Manganese was linearly and negatively correlated with diabetes risk when concentrations of manganese were less than approximately 4.2 μg/L (P for overall < 0.05; P for non-linearity = 0.268). The BKMR model also revealed a negative combined effect of metal mixtures on diabetes risk and potential interactions between six pairs of metals (aluminium-manganese, aluminium-selenium, aluminium-rubidium, aluminium-lead, manganese-selenium, and manganese-rubidium). In summary, we need to pay attention to the role of low plasma levels of aluminium, selenium, manganese, rubidium, and lead in diabetes, especially regarding their safety windows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2025.117941
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study

Huailan Guo, Zijun Yao, Yong‐Jiu Zha, Chen Jin et al.
1 citations
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
1.20
article

Associations of multiple plasma metals with the risk of type 2 diabetes in Chinese adults: A cross-sectional study

Huailan Guo, Zijun Yao, Yong‐Jiu Zha, Chen Jin, Junwei Cai, Han Zhang, Zhen Wang, Liting Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Evidence regarding the associations between co-exposure to multiple metals and diabetes risk was scarce. This study aimed to evaluate the associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk using multiple statistical methods. This cross-sectional study included 192 diabetic patients and 189 healthy subjects. We employed inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to determine the plasma concentrations of 18 metals. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, logistic regression, and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were applied to evaluate associations of multiple metals with diabetes risk comprehensively. These models consistently suggested that aluminium and selenium were positively associated with diabetes risk, while manganese, rubidium, and lead were negatively associated with diabetes risk. Age-specific differences of selenium and sex-specific differences of manganese in diabetes risk were also observed based on stratified analyses. According to RCS analyses, we obtained dose-response relationships between metals and diabetes risk:(1) there were inverted U-shaped associations of plasma aluminium and selenium with diabetes risk, with the threshold close to 20.5µg/L and 75.9µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (2) There were L-shaped associations of rubidium and lead with diabetes risk, with the turning point close to 144.5µg/L and 2.5µg/L, respectively (both P for overall < 0.05; both P for non-linearity < 0.05). (3) Manganese was linearly and negatively correlated with diabetes risk when concentrations of manganese were less than approximately 4.2 μg/L (P for overall < 0.05; P for non-linearity = 0.268). The BKMR model also revealed a negative combined effect of metal mixtures on diabetes risk and potential interactions between six pairs of metals (aluminium-manganese, aluminium-selenium, aluminium-rubidium, aluminium-lead, manganese-selenium, and manganese-rubidium). In summary, we need to pay attention to the role of low plasma levels of aluminium, selenium, manganese, rubidium, and lead in diabetes, especially regarding their safety windows.

Ecotoxicology and Environmental SafetyVol. 292
Hubei University of Medicine (CN), Taihe Hospital (CN), Community Health Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.