Compatible basal area models for live and dying trees using diffusion processes

Abstract Models that predict a forest stand’s evolution are essential for developing plans for sustainable management. A simple mathematical framework was developed that considers the individual tree and stand basal area under random resource competition and is based on two assumptions: (1) a sigmoid-type stochastic process governs tree and stand basal area dynamics of living and dying trees, and (2) the total area that a tree may potentially occupy determines the number of trees per hectare. The most effective method to satisfy these requirements is formalizing each tree diameter and potentially occupied area using Gompertz-type stochastic differential equations governed by fixed and mixed-effect parameters. Data from permanent experimental plots from long-term Lithuania experiments were used to construct the tree and stand basal area models. The new models were relatively unbiased for live trees of all species, including silver birch ( Betula pendula Roth) and downy birch ( Betula pubescens Ehrh.), [spruce ( Picea abies ), and pine ( Pinus sylvestris )]. Less reliable predictions were made for the basal area of dying trees. Pines gave the highest accuracy prediction of mean basal area among all live trees. The mean basal area prediction for all dying trees was lower than that for live trees. Among all species, pine also had the best average basal area prediction accuracy for live trees. Newly developed basal area growth and yield models can be recommended despite their complex formulation and implementation challenges, particularly in situations when data is scarce. This is because the newly observed plot provides sufficient information to calibrate random effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forestry Research
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-025-01829-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compatible basal area models for live and dying trees using diffusion processes

Petras Rupšys
2 citations
Journal of Forestry Research
Forest ecology and management
4.63
article

Compatible basal area models for live and dying trees using diffusion processes

Petras Rupšys
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Models that predict a forest stand’s evolution are essential for developing plans for sustainable management. A simple mathematical framework was developed that considers the individual tree and stand basal area under random resource competition and is based on two assumptions: (1) a sigmoid-type stochastic process governs tree and stand basal area dynamics of living and dying trees, and (2) the total area that a tree may potentially occupy determines the number of trees per hectare. The most effective method to satisfy these requirements is formalizing each tree diameter and potentially occupied area using Gompertz-type stochastic differential equations governed by fixed and mixed-effect parameters. Data from permanent experimental plots from long-term Lithuania experiments were used to construct the tree and stand basal area models. The new models were relatively unbiased for live trees of all species, including silver birch ( Betula pendula Roth) and downy birch ( Betula pubescens Ehrh.), [spruce ( Picea abies ), and pine ( Pinus sylvestris )]. Less reliable predictions were made for the basal area of dying trees. Pines gave the highest accuracy prediction of mean basal area among all live trees. The mean basal area prediction for all dying trees was lower than that for live trees. Among all species, pine also had the best average basal area prediction accuracy for live trees. Newly developed basal area growth and yield models can be recommended despite their complex formulation and implementation challenges, particularly in situations when data is scarce. This is because the newly observed plot provides sufficient information to calibrate random effects.

Journal of Forestry ResearchVol. 36(1)
Vytautas Magnus University (LT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Forest ecology and management
4.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.