The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs

Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0428
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs

Patrick M. O’Connor, Juan Benito, Maria Grace Burton, Elizabeth Martin‐Silverstone et al.
8 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
34.63
article

The influence of soft tissue volume on estimates of skeletal pneumaticity: implications for fossil archosaurs

Patrick M. O’Connor, Juan Benito, Maria Grace Burton, Elizabeth Martin‐Silverstone, Daniel J. Field, Emily F. Smith, Kirsty Mellor
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Air space proportion (ASP), the volume fraction in bone that is occupied by air, is frequently applied as a measure for quantifying the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extant and fossil archosaurs. Nonetheless, ASP estimates rely on a key assumption: that the soft tissue mass within pneumatic bones is negligible, an assumption that has rarely been explicitly acknowledged or tested. Here, we provide the first comparisons between estimated air space proportion (where the internal cavity of a pneumatic bone is assumed to be completely air-filled) and true air space proportion (ASPt, where soft tissues present within the internal cavities of fresh specimens are considered). Using birds as model archosaurs exhibiting postcranial skeletal pneumaticity, we find that estimates of ASPt are significantly lower than estimates of ASP, raising an important consideration that should be acknowledged in investigations of the evolution of skeletal pneumaticity and bulk skeletal density in extinct archosaurs, as well as in volume-based estimates of archosaur body mass. We advocate for the difference between ASP and ASPt to be explicitly acknowledged in studies seeking to quantify the extent of skeletal pneumaticity in extinct archosaurs, to avoid the risk of systematically overestimating the volume fraction of pneumatic bones composed of air.This article is part of the theme issue 'The biology of the avian respiratory system'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 380(1920)
University of Cambridge (GB), Denver Museum of Nature and Science (US), University of Bristol (GB), Ohio University (US)
UK Research and Innovation, Natural Environment Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
34.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.