Erich Auerbach’s Figural Interpretation and the Uncanny Jew

The German Jewish scholar Erich Auerbach comments with uncharacteristic candor about his feelings regarding Jews in a 1941 letter to his fellow expatriate in Turkish exile Alexander Rüstow. Auerbach describes Jews as “uncanny” (unheimlich): after their ancient exile, Jews became a homeless, ghostly people and fell out of historical temporality. The language of the letter suggests that Auerbach recasts his essay “Figura” (1938) to highlight “figural interpretation” as a form of Jewish uncanniness by connecting the figural interpretation of Jewish scripture to a history of anti-Jewish tropes of cultural moribundity and homelessness. The letter places Auerbach and his most influential essay in dialogue about the uncanny with Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, and, proleptically, Jacques Derrida. It especially reveals Auerbach grappling with his older contemporary Franz Rosenzweig about uncanny, particularist, and universal identity and suggests that Auerbach’s cosmopolitanism verges on a disaffiliation that challenges our notion of the committed intellectual.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
New German Critique
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033x-11503057
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erich Auerbach’s Figural Interpretation and the Uncanny Jew

Martin Elsky
1 citations
New German Critique
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
8.93
article

Erich Auerbach’s Figural Interpretation and the Uncanny Jew

Martin Elsky
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The German Jewish scholar Erich Auerbach comments with uncharacteristic candor about his feelings regarding Jews in a 1941 letter to his fellow expatriate in Turkish exile Alexander Rüstow. Auerbach describes Jews as “uncanny” (unheimlich): after their ancient exile, Jews became a homeless, ghostly people and fell out of historical temporality. The language of the letter suggests that Auerbach recasts his essay “Figura” (1938) to highlight “figural interpretation” as a form of Jewish uncanniness by connecting the figural interpretation of Jewish scripture to a history of anti-Jewish tropes of cultural moribundity and homelessness. The letter places Auerbach and his most influential essay in dialogue about the uncanny with Sigmund Freud, Walter Benjamin, and, proleptically, Jacques Derrida. It especially reveals Auerbach grappling with his older contemporary Franz Rosenzweig about uncanny, particularist, and universal identity and suggests that Auerbach’s cosmopolitanism verges on a disaffiliation that challenges our notion of the committed intellectual.

New German CritiqueVol. 52(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Critical Theory and Political Philosophy
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.