The Function of Predicatives of Russian Nouns and Syncretism

The purpose of this study is to examine the phenomenon of nouns functioning as impersonal predicatives in modern Russian from the perspective of transposition and syncretism. It also evaluates the impact of this phenomenon on Russian sentence structure and identifies the communicative effects of noun predicative usage.<br/> The category of state refers to static situations and morphologically appears as invariant forms, serving as predicatives in impersonal sentences. In most cases, noun predicatives emerge as a result of a transposition known as predicativization. Nouns are used as impersonal predicatives while reflecting varying degrees of predicativization. The higher the stage of transposition, the greater the degree of lexicalization, allowing them to be used independently or in combination with dative arguments, thereby reliably functioning as predicatives in impersonal constructions.<br/> Nouns that function as impersonal predicatives are abstract nouns with evaluative or modal semantic components. They often represent human emotional states, ethical evaluations, or modality related to necessity and possibility.<br/> The phenomenon of noun predicatives originates from the communicative needs of language users. Compared to ‘–о’ type predicatives, noun-predicatives provide a definitive description of a state and enhance expressive effect. Additionally, internal linguistic factors, such as the development of grammatical copulas, can be cited as reasons for nouns acquiring predicative functions. Noun predicatives reflect the characteristics of contemporary language, where functions shift to achieve new semantic effects, consequently reorganizing sentence structures.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Slavic Studies
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46694/jss.2024.12.39.4.145
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Function of Predicatives of Russian Nouns and Syncretism

Nam Kyung Lee
The Journal of Slavic Studies
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
article

The Function of Predicatives of Russian Nouns and Syncretism

Nam Kyung Lee
article en

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the phenomenon of nouns functioning as impersonal predicatives in modern Russian from the perspective of transposition and syncretism. It also evaluates the impact of this phenomenon on Russian sentence structure and identifies the communicative effects of noun predicative usage.<br/> The category of state refers to static situations and morphologically appears as invariant forms, serving as predicatives in impersonal sentences. In most cases, noun predicatives emerge as a result of a transposition known as predicativization. Nouns are used as impersonal predicatives while reflecting varying degrees of predicativization. The higher the stage of transposition, the greater the degree of lexicalization, allowing them to be used independently or in combination with dative arguments, thereby reliably functioning as predicatives in impersonal constructions.<br/> Nouns that function as impersonal predicatives are abstract nouns with evaluative or modal semantic components. They often represent human emotional states, ethical evaluations, or modality related to necessity and possibility.<br/> The phenomenon of noun predicatives originates from the communicative needs of language users. Compared to ‘–о’ type predicatives, noun-predicatives provide a definitive description of a state and enhance expressive effect. Additionally, internal linguistic factors, such as the development of grammatical copulas, can be cited as reasons for nouns acquiring predicative functions. Noun predicatives reflect the characteristics of contemporary language, where functions shift to achieve new semantic effects, consequently reorganizing sentence structures.

The Journal of Slavic StudiesVol. 39(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.