Separation of heat transfer modes in fire: Review and analysis

The local heat transfer to a fire-exposed surface consists of radiative and convective components. Computational fluid dynamics fire models independently predict each of these heat transfer modes. However, experimental measurements of heat transfer are typically limited to measurements of the total heat transfer rather than the separation of individual components. As a result, it can be difficult to identify whether total heat transfer discrepancies between models and experiments are due to errors in convective and/or radiative heat transfer. Several different approaches have been presented over the years to separate the total measured heat transfer into its individual components. Each method comes with its own assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties. This paper provides a review of the existing literature on this topic which is augmented with engineering analysis. Previous studies are summarized, the mathematical formulations in each method are presented, and the uncertainties associated with the assumptions are discussed. These results are then used to estimate the expanded uncertainty associated with each approach. Under ideal conditions, the uncertainty of the separated heat transfer modes are approximately 15% of the total heat flux. Under less ideal conditions this uncertainty is higher. General recommendations to reduce these uncertainties in future studies are provided. • Summarizes studies on separating heat transfer modes in fire using four methods. • Provides data on repeatability of heat transfer measurements in local fire exposures. • Presents engineering analysis of assumptions employed by each separation method. • Calculates the expanded uncertainty associated with each separation method. • Provides general recommendations to minimize uncertainties in future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fire Safety Journal
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104353
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.73

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Separation of heat transfer modes in fire: Review and analysis

Matthew J. DiDomizio, Jonathan L. Hodges, Jason Floyd
9 citations
Fire Safety Journal
Fire dynamics and safety research
11.73
article

Separation of heat transfer modes in fire: Review and analysis

Matthew J. DiDomizio, Jonathan L. Hodges, Jason Floyd
article en
9 citations

Abstract

The local heat transfer to a fire-exposed surface consists of radiative and convective components. Computational fluid dynamics fire models independently predict each of these heat transfer modes. However, experimental measurements of heat transfer are typically limited to measurements of the total heat transfer rather than the separation of individual components. As a result, it can be difficult to identify whether total heat transfer discrepancies between models and experiments are due to errors in convective and/or radiative heat transfer. Several different approaches have been presented over the years to separate the total measured heat transfer into its individual components. Each method comes with its own assumptions, limitations, and uncertainties. This paper provides a review of the existing literature on this topic which is augmented with engineering analysis. Previous studies are summarized, the mathematical formulations in each method are presented, and the uncertainties associated with the assumptions are discussed. These results are then used to estimate the expanded uncertainty associated with each approach. Under ideal conditions, the uncertainty of the separated heat transfer modes are approximately 15% of the total heat flux. Under less ideal conditions this uncertainty is higher. General recommendations to reduce these uncertainties in future studies are provided. • Summarizes studies on separating heat transfer modes in fire using four methods. • Provides data on repeatability of heat transfer measurements in local fire exposures. • Presents engineering analysis of assumptions employed by each separation method. • Calculates the expanded uncertainty associated with each separation method. • Provides general recommendations to minimize uncertainties in future studies.

Fire Safety JournalVol. 153
American Institutes for Research (US), Jensen Hughes (United States) (US)
Material Measurement Laboratory
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Fire dynamics and safety research
11.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.