Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0

Industrial Revolution 4.0, with its emphasis on smart manufacturing, has a profound impact on traditional employment.This study aims to examine changes in firms' employment decisions in the context of Industry 4.0, shedding light on the conflict between liberalism's market mechanisms and statism's government interventions.Given China's status as the world's largest emerging market, its unique politico economic structure and the global technological transformation of Industry 4.0 jointly shape a dynamic labor market that requires a balance between government intervention and market forces.Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese companies from 2007 to 2022, we employ a difference-indifferences (DID) approach and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation to empirically investigate changes in firms' labor demand under Industry 4.0.To ensure robustness, we perform several other analyses, including parallel trend tests and placebo tests.Our results indicate that Industry 4.0 reduces the overall labor demand of firms, characterized by a decrease in low-skilled workers and an increase in high-skilled workers.Furthermore, a triple difference model reveals that market forces exacerbate the negative employment effects of Industry 4.0, whereas government interventions mitigate these effects to some extent.Our findings offer a new perspective on how Industry 4.0 influences the employment market within the frameworks of statism and liberalism.It also proposes a potential resolution to the conflict between liberalism and statism in the context of Industry 4.0, while providing valuable insight into corporate employment decisions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Amfiteatru Economic
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24818/ea/2025/68/145
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0

Chuanjiang Wang, Jing Yang, Guowan Yan
3 citations
Amfiteatru Economic
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.45
article

Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0

Chuanjiang Wang, Jing Yang, Guowan Yan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Industrial Revolution 4.0, with its emphasis on smart manufacturing, has a profound impact on traditional employment.This study aims to examine changes in firms' employment decisions in the context of Industry 4.0, shedding light on the conflict between liberalism's market mechanisms and statism's government interventions.Given China's status as the world's largest emerging market, its unique politico economic structure and the global technological transformation of Industry 4.0 jointly shape a dynamic labor market that requires a balance between government intervention and market forces.Using a sample of publicly listed Chinese companies from 2007 to 2022, we employ a difference-indifferences (DID) approach and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimation to empirically investigate changes in firms' labor demand under Industry 4.0.To ensure robustness, we perform several other analyses, including parallel trend tests and placebo tests.Our results indicate that Industry 4.0 reduces the overall labor demand of firms, characterized by a decrease in low-skilled workers and an increase in high-skilled workers.Furthermore, a triple difference model reveals that market forces exacerbate the negative employment effects of Industry 4.0, whereas government interventions mitigate these effects to some extent.Our findings offer a new perspective on how Industry 4.0 influences the employment market within the frameworks of statism and liberalism.It also proposes a potential resolution to the conflict between liberalism and statism in the context of Industry 4.0, while providing valuable insight into corporate employment decisions.

Amfiteatru EconomicVol. 27(68)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Employment and Welfare Studies
8.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Navigating Employment Transformations: Liberalism vs. Statism in the Era of Industry 4.0 — Chuanjiang Wang, Jing Yang, et al. · Amfiteatru Economic (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS