Fuzzy Boundaries or Hard Borders? Cultural Groupings in Second Millennium bc Nubia from the View of Linguistic Evidence

Abstract The region of Sudan and Nubia has always been witness to a complicated nexus of linguistic groupings, frequently exhibiting episodes of linguistic shifts, migration, and extinction. From Nilo-Saharan languages like Meroitic, to Afroasiatic languages like Beja, the region of the Second Millennium bce Middle Nile was certainly not homogenous ethno-linguistically. Linguistic enigmas provide further confusion, like the unknown languages of Lower Nubia that correlate to A- and C-Group material horizons. This paper describes the limits of the evidence in organizing linguistic groupings of ancient Nubia and critiques the issue as to whether these linguistic blocs correlate to geographic boundaries of specific material cultures. Does homogeneity in the archaeological record demonstrate similar homogeneity in linguistic identity? How do we expect nomadic pastoralists, seasonal movements, and migrations to affect this linguistic map? With a focus on pragmatic arguments and the use of later linguistic evidence, this paper reflects on the peopling of the Middle Nile region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Old World Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia
Published
2025-02-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26670755-04020013
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
24.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuzzy Boundaries or Hard Borders? Cultural Groupings in Second Millennium bc Nubia from the View of Linguistic Evidence

Julien Cooper
3 citations
Old World Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
24.82
article

Fuzzy Boundaries or Hard Borders? Cultural Groupings in Second Millennium bc Nubia from the View of Linguistic Evidence

Julien Cooper
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract The region of Sudan and Nubia has always been witness to a complicated nexus of linguistic groupings, frequently exhibiting episodes of linguistic shifts, migration, and extinction. From Nilo-Saharan languages like Meroitic, to Afroasiatic languages like Beja, the region of the Second Millennium bce Middle Nile was certainly not homogenous ethno-linguistically. Linguistic enigmas provide further confusion, like the unknown languages of Lower Nubia that correlate to A- and C-Group material horizons. This paper describes the limits of the evidence in organizing linguistic groupings of ancient Nubia and critiques the issue as to whether these linguistic blocs correlate to geographic boundaries of specific material cultures. Does homogeneity in the archaeological record demonstrate similar homogeneity in linguistic identity? How do we expect nomadic pastoralists, seasonal movements, and migrations to affect this linguistic map? With a focus on pragmatic arguments and the use of later linguistic evidence, this paper reflects on the peopling of the Middle Nile region.

Old World Journal of Ancient Africa and EurasiaVol. 5
Beijing Normal University (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
24.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Fuzzy Boundaries or Hard Borders? Cultural Groupings in Second Millennium bc Nubia from the View of Linguistic Evidence — Julien Cooper · Old World Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS