Juvenile Apprehension and Prosecution Process of Indonesia and Philippines: A Comparative Study<b></b>

This study aims to compare find out the similarities and differences of the Juvenile Apprehension Prosecution Process of the Philippines and Indonesia. The researchers utilized the descriptive comparative analysis in conducting this study. This research is conducted using secondary data by utilizing the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No. 11 of 2012 of Indonesia as sources. The researcher has the following criteria in comparing if there are provisions under the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No.11 of 2012 of Indonesia that provides for the (a) Apprehension Process (b) Prosecution Process and (c) Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding the CICL. The researchers found out that (1) there two (2) similar and (4) different provisions that pertains to the Apprehension Process (2) there are (1) similar and (3) different provisions that pertains to Prosecution Process and (3) that the Republic Act 9344 and Law No. 11 of 2012 have similar provisions that pertains to Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding CICL.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Hukum Sasana
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v10i1.1568
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Juvenile Apprehension and Prosecution Process of Indonesia and Philippines: A Comparative Study

Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, Johndex Emanuel S. Villarico, Hipolito B. Quillip
Jurnal Hukum Sasana
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Juvenile Apprehension and Prosecution Process of Indonesia and Philippines: A Comparative Study

Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, Johndex Emanuel S. Villarico, Hipolito B. Quillip
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare find out the similarities and differences of the Juvenile Apprehension Prosecution Process of the Philippines and Indonesia. The researchers utilized the descriptive comparative analysis in conducting this study. This research is conducted using secondary data by utilizing the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No. 11 of 2012 of Indonesia as sources. The researcher has the following criteria in comparing if there are provisions under the Republic Act 9344 of the Philippines and the Law No.11 of 2012 of Indonesia that provides for the (a) Apprehension Process (b) Prosecution Process and (c) Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding the CICL. The researchers found out that (1) there two (2) similar and (4) different provisions that pertains to the Apprehension Process (2) there are (1) similar and (3) different provisions that pertains to Prosecution Process and (3) that the Republic Act 9344 and Law No. 11 of 2012 have similar provisions that pertains to Ensuring the Confidentiality of the Information Regarding CICL.

Jurnal Hukum SasanaVol. 10(2)
University of Mindanao (PH), Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Juvenile Apprehension and Prosecution Process of Indonesia and Philippines: A Comparative Study<b></b> — Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, Johndex Emanuel S. Villarico, et al. · Jurnal Hukum Sasana (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS