Eliminative Ontic Structural Realism and the Metaphysical Underdetermination Argument: A Critique
In this paper I address the problem of justifying Steven French’s eliminative ontic structural realism by the metaphysical underdetermination argument. My main goal is to show that there are underlying strategies in the argument and that they are questionable. I provide arguments for this claim and conclude that while the metaphysical thesis of eliminative ontic structural realism is dismissible, French’s views can be characterized without it – at a very high price, however. ---------------------------------------- Received: 23/04/2024. Reviewed: 7/10/2024. Accepted: 15/11/2024.
Authors
- Damian Luty (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0194-9790)
Institutions
- Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Studia Philosophiae Christianae
- Published
- 2024-12-31
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.a.18
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy and History of Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.04
Funders
- Narodowe Centrum Nauki