Eliminative Ontic Structural Realism and the Metaphysical Underdetermination Argument: A Critique

In this paper I address the problem of justifying Steven French’s eliminative ontic structural realism by the metaphysical underdetermination argument. My main goal is to show that there are underlying strategies in the argument and that they are questionable. I provide arguments for this claim and conclude that while the metaphysical thesis of eliminative ontic structural realism is dismissible, French’s views can be characterized without it – at a very high price, however. ---------------------------------------- Received: 23/04/2024. Reviewed: 7/10/2024. Accepted: 15/11/2024.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.a.18
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eliminative Ontic Structural Realism and the Metaphysical Underdetermination Argument: A Critique

Damian Luty
1 citations
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
article

Eliminative Ontic Structural Realism and the Metaphysical Underdetermination Argument: A Critique

Damian Luty
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this paper I address the problem of justifying Steven French’s eliminative ontic structural realism by the metaphysical underdetermination argument. My main goal is to show that there are underlying strategies in the argument and that they are questionable. I provide arguments for this claim and conclude that while the metaphysical thesis of eliminative ontic structural realism is dismissible, French’s views can be characterized without it – at a very high price, however. ---------------------------------------- Received: 23/04/2024. Reviewed: 7/10/2024. Accepted: 15/11/2024.

Studia Philosophiae ChristianaeVol. 60(2)
Poznań University of Economics and Business (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.