Preparing public health researchers to interact with state-level legislators: evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration project training

To implement evidence-based health policy, public health researchers need to be equipped with the necessary skills or knowledge to engage with policymakers effectively. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) training on public health professionals and to compare the effectiveness of different training delivery modes (in-person or web-based). In the study, 59 researchers received training to increase their capacity for interacting with legislators and completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing three scales: self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. To determine researchers' pre- and post-training changes, we applied paired t tests. Two-sample t tests were used to compare the differences in outcomes between the two training modes. Researchers showed significant improvement in reported policy and knowledge of the legislative process and reported reduced perceived training needs for both delivery modes. The TX RPC training prepared researchers for interacting with legislators by increasing their policy-related self-efficacy and knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Health Policy
Published
2025-02-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00555-z
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing public health researchers to interact with state-level legislators: evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration project training

Christine Jovanovic, Taylor Scott, Deanna M. Hoelscher, Yuzi Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Public Health Policy
Public Health Policies and Education
2.82
article

Preparing public health researchers to interact with state-level legislators: evaluation of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration project training

Christine Jovanovic, Taylor Scott, Deanna M. Hoelscher, Yuzi Zhang, Tiffni Menendez, Kathleen Manuel, Elizabeth C. Long, Daniel Max Crowley, Alexandra E. van den Berg, Amelia Roebuck, Shelby Flores-Thorpe
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To implement evidence-based health policy, public health researchers need to be equipped with the necessary skills or knowledge to engage with policymakers effectively. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Texas Research-to-Policy Collaboration (TX RPC) training on public health professionals and to compare the effectiveness of different training delivery modes (in-person or web-based). In the study, 59 researchers received training to increase their capacity for interacting with legislators and completed pre- and post-training surveys assessing three scales: self-efficacy, knowledge, and training needs. To determine researchers' pre- and post-training changes, we applied paired t tests. Two-sample t tests were used to compare the differences in outcomes between the two training modes. Researchers showed significant improvement in reported policy and knowledge of the legislative process and reported reduced perceived training needs for both delivery modes. The TX RPC training prepared researchers for interacting with legislators by increasing their policy-related self-efficacy and knowledge.

Journal of Public Health PolicyVol. 46(2)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Healthy Start (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Public Health Policies and Education
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.