Governance Models in Education: Insights for Nepal’s Federal Education System

This article explores educational governance by reviewing relevant literature, policies, and reports from different contexts and countries. Employing a desk review method, it investigates various governance frameworks, including centralized, decentralized, and hybrid models, to evaluate their impacts on education systems. The results indicate that decentralized governance generally enhances school autonomy and accountability, fostering innovation and local responsiveness. In contrast, centralized systems tend to be more effective in upholding uniform standards and consistent service provision. Hybrid models present a balanced solution by blending the benefits of both governance approaches. Drawing lessons from global experiences, the article delivers insights for developing an effective governance framework for Nepal's evolving federal education system. It emphasizes the importance of a governance model that promotes equitable access to quality education while allocating the responsibilities among the three tiers of government.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AMC Journal
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3126/amcj.v5i1.75960
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governance Models in Education: Insights for Nepal’s Federal Education System

Narayan Prasad Bhatta
1 citations
AMC Journal
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
2.10
article

Governance Models in Education: Insights for Nepal’s Federal Education System

Narayan Prasad Bhatta
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article explores educational governance by reviewing relevant literature, policies, and reports from different contexts and countries. Employing a desk review method, it investigates various governance frameworks, including centralized, decentralized, and hybrid models, to evaluate their impacts on education systems. The results indicate that decentralized governance generally enhances school autonomy and accountability, fostering innovation and local responsiveness. In contrast, centralized systems tend to be more effective in upholding uniform standards and consistent service provision. Hybrid models present a balanced solution by blending the benefits of both governance approaches. Drawing lessons from global experiences, the article delivers insights for developing an effective governance framework for Nepal's evolving federal education system. It emphasizes the importance of a governance model that promotes equitable access to quality education while allocating the responsibilities among the three tiers of government.

AMC JournalVol. 5(1)
Tribhuvan University (NP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender, Education, and Development Issues
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.