Ethical Risk in Research and Challenge to Academic Integrity

The purpose of the work is to delve into the hypothetical proposition that ethics in research, academic and in allied professional space are often negotiated. This can be considered 'ethical deficit' in the practice, resulting the impression of uncertainty in the minds of research findings receivers. So, paper would argue that practice of ethics has been in 'complex position'. Section I would be to understand the state of complexities of ethical positions in different forms and aspects. Section II of the writing would be dealing to identify different types and factors behind ethical misconduct in the publication context. Section III would involve identifying possible implications on account of breach of ethical principles. Moreover, writing takes the basis of arguing that unethical commitment in the aspects of delivering findings, publishing ideas can bring severe and reverse consequences to academic community, society and professionalism. Section IV would have the end argument for remedies that can be initiated and institutionalised from different parties such as scholars, researchers, academicians, academic institutions, publishing houses and the government.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Applied Ethics
Published
2024-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.51245/ijaethics.v10i1.2024.76
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Risk in Research and Challenge to Academic Integrity

Gojen Daimari
International Journal of Applied Ethics
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Ethical Risk in Research and Challenge to Academic Integrity

Gojen Daimari
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the work is to delve into the hypothetical proposition that ethics in research, academic and in allied professional space are often negotiated. This can be considered 'ethical deficit' in the practice, resulting the impression of uncertainty in the minds of research findings receivers. So, paper would argue that practice of ethics has been in 'complex position'. Section I would be to understand the state of complexities of ethical positions in different forms and aspects. Section II of the writing would be dealing to identify different types and factors behind ethical misconduct in the publication context. Section III would involve identifying possible implications on account of breach of ethical principles. Moreover, writing takes the basis of arguing that unethical commitment in the aspects of delivering findings, publishing ideas can bring severe and reverse consequences to academic community, society and professionalism. Section IV would have the end argument for remedies that can be initiated and institutionalised from different parties such as scholars, researchers, academicians, academic institutions, publishing houses and the government.

International Journal of Applied EthicsVol. 10(1)
Marymount University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.