Evaluation of the Slovenian Breast Cancer Screening Programme: Years of Life Gained and Avoided Deaths

<b>Background</b>: Most commonly, mortality is used for evaluation of organized breast cancer screening programmes. Survival analyses are also being employed to provide more timely assessment. A novel approach has been introduced for calculating survival using Slovenian data. <b>Methods</b>: Breast cancer cases from the Slovenian Cancer Registry between 2008-2021 in women aged 50 to 72 were included, supplemented by data on the screening history from the screening registry. The comparison was made in two scenarios-invited or not invited to the screening. Survival, years of life gained, and number of avoided deaths over 10 years were calculated and standardized. The comparison was adjusted for confounding covariates, and a biological tumour growth model was used to adjust the survival of the invited group for lead time bias and over-detection. <b>Results</b>: A total of 9392 breast cancer cases were included in the study. Estimated median lead time for screen-detected cases was 1.23 years. The survival probability accounting for lead time bias and covariates of cancers patients invited to the programme was 4.3 percentage points higher than the not invited (0.81 vs. 0.76). Standardized to 100,000 women in the 2-year period, this would result in 22 avoided deaths. On average, the invited cancer patient lived 0.22 years longer, which amounts to a total of 114 years of life gained. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results show the overall benefit of the breast cancer screening programme. The standardized results enable cross-country comparisons. The calculation of years of life gained and avoided deaths can provide additional opportunities for communicating the results to non-expert populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17050742
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Slovenian Breast Cancer Screening Programme: Years of Life Gained and Avoided Deaths

Maja Pohar Perme, Tina Žagar, Katja Jarm, Sonja Tomšič et al.
Cancers
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

Evaluation of the Slovenian Breast Cancer Screening Programme: Years of Life Gained and Avoided Deaths

Maja Pohar Perme, Tina Žagar, Katja Jarm, Sonja Tomšič, Bor Vratanar, Vesna Zadnik
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Most commonly, mortality is used for evaluation of organized breast cancer screening programmes. Survival analyses are also being employed to provide more timely assessment. A novel approach has been introduced for calculating survival using Slovenian data. <b>Methods</b>: Breast cancer cases from the Slovenian Cancer Registry between 2008-2021 in women aged 50 to 72 were included, supplemented by data on the screening history from the screening registry. The comparison was made in two scenarios-invited or not invited to the screening. Survival, years of life gained, and number of avoided deaths over 10 years were calculated and standardized. The comparison was adjusted for confounding covariates, and a biological tumour growth model was used to adjust the survival of the invited group for lead time bias and over-detection. <b>Results</b>: A total of 9392 breast cancer cases were included in the study. Estimated median lead time for screen-detected cases was 1.23 years. The survival probability accounting for lead time bias and covariates of cancers patients invited to the programme was 4.3 percentage points higher than the not invited (0.81 vs. 0.76). Standardized to 100,000 women in the 2-year period, this would result in 22 avoided deaths. On average, the invited cancer patient lived 0.22 years longer, which amounts to a total of 114 years of life gained. <b>Conclusions</b>: The results show the overall benefit of the breast cancer screening programme. The standardized results enable cross-country comparisons. The calculation of years of life gained and avoided deaths can provide additional opportunities for communicating the results to non-expert populations.

CancersVol. 17(5)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Institute of Oncology Ljubljana (SI)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.