Pressupostos, salvo engano, de uma divergência nada silenciosa: Natividade, Abel Barros Baptista e Roberto Schwarz

we'll discuss points made by Roberto Schwarz and Abel B. Baptista, based on the outside/inside dichotomy, around Machado's criticism and the evaluation of the “foreigner's” place. The importance of the local and its overcoming is debated in order to think about a certain posture that is constructed as restrictive and as excluding for both: if, in Schwarz, this appears as the primacy of the national, in Baptista it is his version of hospitality that makes his assumptions aporetic, when thinking about comparatism. Finally, our conclusions return to Schwarz, when we note the hijacking of a name (Gayatri C. Spivak) and, by paraphrasing some of the Spivak's points, we seek to demonstrate that it is possible to unite, in a way that both Schwarz and Baptista do not agree on, the theories that both try to defend as the only possible ones for analysis because, in Spivak, we often see the exact combination of comparatism and Marxism for argumentative construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ABEI Journal
Published
2024-10-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/c3w8yr96
Primary Topic
Psychology and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pressupostos, salvo engano, de uma divergência nada silenciosa: Natividade, Abel Barros Baptista e Roberto Schwarz

Fabio Pomponio Saldanha
ABEI Journal
Psychology and Mental Health
article

Pressupostos, salvo engano, de uma divergência nada silenciosa: Natividade, Abel Barros Baptista e Roberto Schwarz

Fabio Pomponio Saldanha
article en

Abstract

we'll discuss points made by Roberto Schwarz and Abel B. Baptista, based on the outside/inside dichotomy, around Machado's criticism and the evaluation of the “foreigner's” place. The importance of the local and its overcoming is debated in order to think about a certain posture that is constructed as restrictive and as excluding for both: if, in Schwarz, this appears as the primacy of the national, in Baptista it is his version of hospitality that makes his assumptions aporetic, when thinking about comparatism. Finally, our conclusions return to Schwarz, when we note the hijacking of a name (Gayatri C. Spivak) and, by paraphrasing some of the Spivak's points, we seek to demonstrate that it is possible to unite, in a way that both Schwarz and Baptista do not agree on, the theories that both try to defend as the only possible ones for analysis because, in Spivak, we often see the exact combination of comparatism and Marxism for argumentative construction.

ABEI JournalVol. 26(2)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Psychology and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.