Testing gravitational waveforms in full General Relativity

Abstract We perform a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art waveform models, focusing on their predictions concerning kick velocity and inferred gravitational wave memory. Recent advancements in gravitational wave instrumentation have established new benchmarks for the precision of future measurements. To fully exploit the potential of upcoming gravitational wave surveys, it is crucial to concurrently enhance both semi-analytical and numerical waveform models used for analyzing interferometer data. In this work, we establish a pathway towards achieving this goal by developing and implementing a pipeline to assess the accuracy of waveform models using energy-momentum balance laws derived in full, non-linear General Relativity. The numerical accuracy assessment is performed for precessing as well as non-precessing simulations for models belonging to the EOB , Phenom , and Surrogate families. Our analysis reveals statistically significant deviations, which we trace back to inaccuracies in modeling subdominant modes and inherent systematic errors in the chosen models. We corroborate our findings through analytical considerations regarding the mixing of harmonic modes in the computed kick velocities and inferred memories. The methodology developed and validated in this article provides a foundational approach for future waveform assessments and a selection guide for waveform models in practical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2025-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/060
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing gravitational waveforms in full General Relativity

Lavinia Heisenberg, Jann Zosso, H. Inchauspé, David Maibach et al.
1 citations
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
article

Testing gravitational waveforms in full General Relativity

Lavinia Heisenberg, Jann Zosso, H. Inchauspé, David Maibach, Francesco Gozzini, Fabio D’Ambrosio
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract We perform a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art waveform models, focusing on their predictions concerning kick velocity and inferred gravitational wave memory. Recent advancements in gravitational wave instrumentation have established new benchmarks for the precision of future measurements. To fully exploit the potential of upcoming gravitational wave surveys, it is crucial to concurrently enhance both semi-analytical and numerical waveform models used for analyzing interferometer data. In this work, we establish a pathway towards achieving this goal by developing and implementing a pipeline to assess the accuracy of waveform models using energy-momentum balance laws derived in full, non-linear General Relativity. The numerical accuracy assessment is performed for precessing as well as non-precessing simulations for models belonging to the EOB , Phenom , and Surrogate families. Our analysis reveals statistically significant deviations, which we trace back to inaccuracies in modeling subdominant modes and inherent systematic errors in the chosen models. We corroborate our findings through analytical considerations regarding the mixing of harmonic modes in the computed kick velocities and inferred memories. The methodology developed and validated in this article provides a foundational approach for future waveform assessments and a selection guide for waveform models in practical applications.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle PhysicsVol. 2025(02)
Heidelberg University (DE), ETH Zurich (CH), Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.