IAEA Safety Guides vs. Actual Challenges for Design and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys

An analysis of the international radon regulatory framework identified actual challenges for the design and conduct of indoor radon surveys, though there is little discussion on this issue in the radon community. The main challenges hindering the development of radon regulation on an international scale, particularly in indoor radon surveys include the following: (i) responsibility for indoor radon testing and mitigation, (ii) excessive focus on Radon Priority Areas, (iii) the role of temporal uncertainty in indoor radon testing, (iv) the standardization of indoor radon measurements, and (v) the standardization of thoron EEC measurements and indoor testing. To address these gaps and inconsistencies, actual needs for design and conduct of indoor radon surveys are proposed, covering the aforementioned challenges. The needs statement, including a discussion of solutions, addresses the following key aspects of radon regulation: (1) legislation, (2) radon measurements, (3) awareness, and (4) building protection. The focus remains on the radon measurement aspect, detailing the strategy and tools for conducting indoor radon surveys within a rational approach. This includes the main research activities necessary for the sustainable development of global radon regulation. The final part of the article presents a Rational Method (protocol) of indoor radon measurements serving as a detailed guideline for standardizing indoor radon testing at the international level. This ensures the decision-making reliability of at least 95% and harmonizes relevant national approaches considering traditional measurement protocols using both short-term and long-term measurements. The proposed solutions aim to achieve the goal of a modern design and conduct of indoor radon surveys that are consistent with large-scale (mass) testing and effectively identify hazardous buildings. These solutions are based on a rational approach with convenient tools and active voluntary participation of the population to be implemented within the framework of national radon regulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030253
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IAEA Safety Guides vs. Actual Challenges for Design and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys

С. М. Киселев, Petr Miklyaev, Robert Bobkier, Konstantin Kovler et al.
8 citations
Atmosphere
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
15.40
article

IAEA Safety Guides vs. Actual Challenges for Design and Conduct of Indoor Radon Surveys

С. М. Киселев, Petr Miklyaev, Robert Bobkier, Konstantin Kovler, Ilia Yarmoshenko, Andrey Tsapalov
article en
8 citations

Abstract

An analysis of the international radon regulatory framework identified actual challenges for the design and conduct of indoor radon surveys, though there is little discussion on this issue in the radon community. The main challenges hindering the development of radon regulation on an international scale, particularly in indoor radon surveys include the following: (i) responsibility for indoor radon testing and mitigation, (ii) excessive focus on Radon Priority Areas, (iii) the role of temporal uncertainty in indoor radon testing, (iv) the standardization of indoor radon measurements, and (v) the standardization of thoron EEC measurements and indoor testing. To address these gaps and inconsistencies, actual needs for design and conduct of indoor radon surveys are proposed, covering the aforementioned challenges. The needs statement, including a discussion of solutions, addresses the following key aspects of radon regulation: (1) legislation, (2) radon measurements, (3) awareness, and (4) building protection. The focus remains on the radon measurement aspect, detailing the strategy and tools for conducting indoor radon surveys within a rational approach. This includes the main research activities necessary for the sustainable development of global radon regulation. The final part of the article presents a Rational Method (protocol) of indoor radon measurements serving as a detailed guideline for standardizing indoor radon testing at the international level. This ensures the decision-making reliability of at least 95% and harmonizes relevant national approaches considering traditional measurement protocols using both short-term and long-term measurements. The proposed solutions aim to achieve the goal of a modern design and conduct of indoor radon surveys that are consistent with large-scale (mass) testing and effectively identify hazardous buildings. These solutions are based on a rational approach with convenient tools and active voluntary participation of the population to be implemented within the framework of national radon regulation.

AtmosphereVol. 16(3)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Sergeev Institute of Environmental Geoscience (RU), Institute of Industrial Ecology (RU), Prysmian Group (United Kingdom) (GB), State Scientific Center of the Russian Federation - Federal Medical Biophysical Center named after A.I. Burnazyan (RU), Federal Medical-Biological Agency (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
15.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.