A Composite Indicator for Primary Diabetes Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

<b>Background:</b> Since the effectiveness of primary DM care (PDMC) is influenced by both health-care-related and external factors, its indicator set must include indicators that are easy-to-understand for all stakeholders, such as composite indicator-based ranking. <b>Objectives:</b> Our study aimed to prepare a composite PDMC indicator, which is adjusted with the GP-independent characteristics of a GMP, in order to evaluate the usefulness of composite indicators in performance-improving programs. <b>Methods:</b> Using indicators standardized by age, sex, and eligibility for exemption certificates (on hemoglobin A1C, lipid status, serum creatinine, and ophthalmological examination, and on influenza vaccination) for Hungarian adult DM care, factor analysis was applied to create a composite DM care quality indicator (CDMI). It was adjusted (ACDMI) by a multivariable linear regression model of the association between structural characteristics of GMPs and the CDMI. <b>Results:</b> There were 516,052 DM patients provided for by 4784 GMPs. The CDMI exhibited significant associations with patients' lower education (β = -0.139, 95%CI: -0.182; -0.095), GPs' age over 65 (β = -0.083, 95%CI: -0.109; -0.056), GMPs with more than 2000 adult patients (β = -0.059, 95%CI: -0.090; -0.027), and urban location (β = 0.096, 95%CI: 0.058; 0.134). The average difference in GMPs' ranks by the CDMI and ACDMI was 583. Extreme poor (N = 147) and extreme good (N = 176) performances of GMPs were identified, and those were categorized further by the role of GP-independent factors in causing the extreme performances (N<sub>healthcareunrelated</sub> = 84; N<sub>healthcarerelated</sub> = 239). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest a stepwise and widely communicable process for PDMC monitoring, which starts with the evaluation of the CDMI and ACDMI to identify the GMPs requiring interventions, making a distinction between extreme GMPs requiring health-care-related interventions and those requiring non-health-care-related interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2025-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13050480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Composite Indicator for Primary Diabetes Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

Ferenc Vincze, László Kőrösi, Feras Kasabji, Anita Pálinkás et al.
1 citations
Healthcare
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
article

A Composite Indicator for Primary Diabetes Care: A Cross-Sectional Study in Hungary

Ferenc Vincze, László Kőrösi, Feras Kasabji, Anita Pálinkás, Undraa Jargalsaikhan, János Sándor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Since the effectiveness of primary DM care (PDMC) is influenced by both health-care-related and external factors, its indicator set must include indicators that are easy-to-understand for all stakeholders, such as composite indicator-based ranking. <b>Objectives:</b> Our study aimed to prepare a composite PDMC indicator, which is adjusted with the GP-independent characteristics of a GMP, in order to evaluate the usefulness of composite indicators in performance-improving programs. <b>Methods:</b> Using indicators standardized by age, sex, and eligibility for exemption certificates (on hemoglobin A1C, lipid status, serum creatinine, and ophthalmological examination, and on influenza vaccination) for Hungarian adult DM care, factor analysis was applied to create a composite DM care quality indicator (CDMI). It was adjusted (ACDMI) by a multivariable linear regression model of the association between structural characteristics of GMPs and the CDMI. <b>Results:</b> There were 516,052 DM patients provided for by 4784 GMPs. The CDMI exhibited significant associations with patients' lower education (β = -0.139, 95%CI: -0.182; -0.095), GPs' age over 65 (β = -0.083, 95%CI: -0.109; -0.056), GMPs with more than 2000 adult patients (β = -0.059, 95%CI: -0.090; -0.027), and urban location (β = 0.096, 95%CI: 0.058; 0.134). The average difference in GMPs' ranks by the CDMI and ACDMI was 583. Extreme poor (N = 147) and extreme good (N = 176) performances of GMPs were identified, and those were categorized further by the role of GP-independent factors in causing the extreme performances (N<sub>healthcareunrelated</sub> = 84; N<sub>healthcarerelated</sub> = 239). <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest a stepwise and widely communicable process for PDMC monitoring, which starts with the evaluation of the CDMI and ACDMI to identify the GMPs requiring interventions, making a distinction between extreme GMPs requiring health-care-related interventions and those requiring non-health-care-related interventions.

HealthcareVol. 13(5)
University of Debrecen (HU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.