How Much Is Enough? Data Requirements for Practical Irrigation Decision-Making in Vietnamese Coffee Production

In making irrigation decisions, farmers typically rely on local observation and experience, such as observing crops and neighbors’ actions. Research has mainly focused on understanding crop water requirements to improve farming practices, but it is important to acknowledge that farmers have unique perspectives, access to diverse local “signals”, and experience. The challenge is to strike a balance between complex technical assessments of field conditions (the science) and harnessing farmers’ skills to manage their irrigation in ways that maximize yield and quality. This study established a basis for specifying minimum data requirements for pragmatic, but not necessarily perfect, irrigation decision-making for small-scale Vietnamese coffee farmers. This study focuses on three areas in Dak Lak province in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. To explore the role of monitoring in irrigation management, two contrasting monitoring systems were set up to collect soil, weather, and irrigation data. We also compared a variety of water balance models with different data requirements, with a focus on processes that used “passive data collection”, i.e., farmers do not manually collect data, rather data can be accessed readily from external sources. In Vietnam, traditional hosepipe irrigation is applied where it is impractical to know the volume of applied water. The proposed Low Data Model (LDM) is suited to more informed irrigation scheduling decisions, which have potential to improve the likelihood of coffee growers adopting measurement-based decision-making. While researchers may seek a detailed daily sub-millimeter understanding of soil water dynamics, farmers require practical decision support if there is to be any adoption of improved methods. This study offers a simple and practical approach for irrigation scheduling rather than a model using numerically perfect data that is unachievable in the field. The work demonstrates that on-site rainfall data is essential. However, other data can be collected passively to reduce the burden of data collection on users. This approach may enhance the likelihood of model-based irrigation scheduling being adopted by coffee farmers in Vietnam.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w17050646
Primary Topic
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Much Is Enough? Data Requirements for Practical Irrigation Decision-Making in Vietnamese Coffee Production

D. M. Freebairn, Michael Scobie, Shahbaz Mushtaq, Darrell W. Donahue
Water
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
article

How Much Is Enough? Data Requirements for Practical Irrigation Decision-Making in Vietnamese Coffee Production

D. M. Freebairn, Michael Scobie, Shahbaz Mushtaq, Darrell W. Donahue
article en

Abstract

In making irrigation decisions, farmers typically rely on local observation and experience, such as observing crops and neighbors’ actions. Research has mainly focused on understanding crop water requirements to improve farming practices, but it is important to acknowledge that farmers have unique perspectives, access to diverse local “signals”, and experience. The challenge is to strike a balance between complex technical assessments of field conditions (the science) and harnessing farmers’ skills to manage their irrigation in ways that maximize yield and quality. This study established a basis for specifying minimum data requirements for pragmatic, but not necessarily perfect, irrigation decision-making for small-scale Vietnamese coffee farmers. This study focuses on three areas in Dak Lak province in the Central Highlands of Vietnam. To explore the role of monitoring in irrigation management, two contrasting monitoring systems were set up to collect soil, weather, and irrigation data. We also compared a variety of water balance models with different data requirements, with a focus on processes that used “passive data collection”, i.e., farmers do not manually collect data, rather data can be accessed readily from external sources. In Vietnam, traditional hosepipe irrigation is applied where it is impractical to know the volume of applied water. The proposed Low Data Model (LDM) is suited to more informed irrigation scheduling decisions, which have potential to improve the likelihood of coffee growers adopting measurement-based decision-making. While researchers may seek a detailed daily sub-millimeter understanding of soil water dynamics, farmers require practical decision support if there is to be any adoption of improved methods. This study offers a simple and practical approach for irrigation scheduling rather than a model using numerically perfect data that is unachievable in the field. The work demonstrates that on-site rainfall data is essential. However, other data can be collected passively to reduce the burden of data collection on users. This approach may enhance the likelihood of model-based irrigation scheduling being adopted by coffee farmers in Vietnam.

WaterVol. 17(5)
West Virginia University (US), University of Southern Queensland (AU), West Virginia State University (US)
University of Southern Queensland
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Irrigation Practices and Water Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.