<i>Marino Faliero</i> : Veils and Frames

Marino Faliero provoked reviewers to seize upon the contradictions between Byron’s intent to reform the English stage by writing on the model of Greek drama, and his assertion that he had with ‘no view to the stage’ at all. The Preface speaks of his commitment to ‘historical facts’, ‘real facts’, of transferring ‘into our language an historical fact worthy of commendation’. But fact is never transparent in Byron; ‘fact’ provokes interpretation from our own moment in time. History in Byron is history- writing , and Marino Faliero challenges readers to follow the patterns that he dramatically fashions in events from the fourteenth century to his own time. Because editorial apparatus affects this process, the binary of reading and performance is succeeded by concern with the formatting of the chosen text. I compare the first edition with widely separated ‘standard’ editions, those of John Wright, E. H. Coleridge, and Jerome McGann.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Byron Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/bj.2024.19
Primary Topic
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marino Faliero : Veils and Frames

Peter J. Manning
The Byron Journal
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
article

Marino Faliero : Veils and Frames

Peter J. Manning
article en

Abstract

Marino Faliero provoked reviewers to seize upon the contradictions between Byron’s intent to reform the English stage by writing on the model of Greek drama, and his assertion that he had with ‘no view to the stage’ at all. The Preface speaks of his commitment to ‘historical facts’, ‘real facts’, of transferring ‘into our language an historical fact worthy of commendation’. But fact is never transparent in Byron; ‘fact’ provokes interpretation from our own moment in time. History in Byron is history- writing , and Marino Faliero challenges readers to follow the patterns that he dramatically fashions in events from the fourteenth century to his own time. Because editorial apparatus affects this process, the binary of reading and performance is succeeded by concern with the formatting of the chosen text. I compare the first edition with widely separated ‘standard’ editions, those of John Wright, E. H. Coleridge, and Jerome McGann.

The Byron JournalVol. 52(2)
Stony Brook University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Italian Fascism and Post-war Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.