Impact of Rewarding and Punitive Behaviors on Robot-Induced Human Actions

This study examines the persuasive effects of rewarding and punitive behaviors in social robots. In this study using the Pepper robot, we defined rewarding behavior as actions expressing positive empathy, and punitive behavior as actions expressing negative empathy. These definitions are specific to the behavior and capabilities of Pepper, but the concepts can be generalized to other social robots with similar functionalities. Our novel persuasion model, guided by the Elaboration Likelihood Model and balance theory, allows the robot to autonomously select behaviors. Experiments involving participants with strong negative attitudes towards robots demonstrated that a combination of rewarding and punitive strategies is more effective in eliciting desired behaviors than using only a positive attitude strategy alone. Results emphasize the importance of emotional expression, particularly tone of voice, in effective human-robot interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/coginfocom63007.2024.10894715
Primary Topic
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Rewarding and Punitive Behaviors on Robot-Induced Human Actions

Mihoko Niitsuma, Otono Uchikawa
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
article

Impact of Rewarding and Punitive Behaviors on Robot-Induced Human Actions

Mihoko Niitsuma, Otono Uchikawa
article en

Abstract

This study examines the persuasive effects of rewarding and punitive behaviors in social robots. In this study using the Pepper robot, we defined rewarding behavior as actions expressing positive empathy, and punitive behavior as actions expressing negative empathy. These definitions are specific to the behavior and capabilities of Pepper, but the concepts can be generalized to other social robots with similar functionalities. Our novel persuasion model, guided by the Elaboration Likelihood Model and balance theory, allows the robot to autonomously select behaviors. Experiments involving participants with strong negative attitudes towards robots demonstrated that a combination of rewarding and punitive strategies is more effective in eliciting desired behaviors than using only a positive attitude strategy alone. Results emphasize the importance of emotional expression, particularly tone of voice, in effective human-robot interaction.

Chuo University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Social Robot Interaction and HRI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.