A Novel Diagnostic Prediction Model for Distinguishing Between Tuberculous and Cryptococcal Meningitis

<b>Background and aim:</b> Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and cryptococcal meningitis (CM) are easily misdiagnosed due to atypical clinical symptoms. It is difficult for physcians to achieve a rapid and accurate differential diagnosis of TBM in the early stages of disease onset. The aim of this study was to construct a diagnostic prediction model for TBM and CM.<b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, 194 patients with TBM and CM were divided into two groups: training group (163 patients) and validation group (31 patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the training group patients. The diagnostic factors were selected to construct the differential diagnostic prediction model for TBM and CM, and the prediction model was verified. A receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was constructed and used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the novel model.<b>Results:</b> Univariate analysis of clinical characteristics revealed differences in eight parameters (<i>P</i><0.05) between tuberculous meningitis and cryptococcal meningitis. The multivariate analyses showed there were five independent differential factors including age, disease course, albumin-to-globulin ratio, cerebrospinal fluid protein, and cerebrospinal fluid sugar to blood sugar ratio in this study between TBM and CM, while there was no significant difference in the number of nucleated cells in CSF (<i>P</i>=0.088). A differential diagnosis model for TBM and CM was constructed based on those factors. A ROC was constructed with an area under curve [AUC] of 94.5%, a sensitivity of 85.71%, and specificity of 94.59% in the training group.<b>Conclusion:</b> The novel diagnostic scoring model for TBM and CM has greater differential diagnosis potential than previous reports, which can provide more reliable preliminary diagnosis results for primary hospitals, effectively reduce misdiagnosis, and provide references for early treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Medicine & Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2024.1869
Primary Topic
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Novel Diagnostic Prediction Model for Distinguishing Between Tuberculous and Cryptococcal Meningitis

Xialing Wang, Zhenzhen Bai, Kebin Zeng, Mutian Niu et al.
Clinical Medicine & Research
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
article

A Novel Diagnostic Prediction Model for Distinguishing Between Tuberculous and Cryptococcal Meningitis

Xialing Wang, Zhenzhen Bai, Kebin Zeng, Mutian Niu, Wei Zheng, Tian Si, Liang Dong, Nannan Dong
article en

Abstract

<b>Background and aim:</b> Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and cryptococcal meningitis (CM) are easily misdiagnosed due to atypical clinical symptoms. It is difficult for physcians to achieve a rapid and accurate differential diagnosis of TBM in the early stages of disease onset. The aim of this study was to construct a diagnostic prediction model for TBM and CM.<b>Methods:</b> In this retrospective study, 194 patients with TBM and CM were divided into two groups: training group (163 patients) and validation group (31 patients). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on the training group patients. The diagnostic factors were selected to construct the differential diagnostic prediction model for TBM and CM, and the prediction model was verified. A receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) was constructed and used to evaluate the diagnostic value of the novel model.<b>Results:</b> Univariate analysis of clinical characteristics revealed differences in eight parameters (<i>P</i><0.05) between tuberculous meningitis and cryptococcal meningitis. The multivariate analyses showed there were five independent differential factors including age, disease course, albumin-to-globulin ratio, cerebrospinal fluid protein, and cerebrospinal fluid sugar to blood sugar ratio in this study between TBM and CM, while there was no significant difference in the number of nucleated cells in CSF (<i>P</i>=0.088). A differential diagnosis model for TBM and CM was constructed based on those factors. A ROC was constructed with an area under curve [AUC] of 94.5%, a sensitivity of 85.71%, and specificity of 94.59% in the training group.<b>Conclusion:</b> The novel diagnostic scoring model for TBM and CM has greater differential diagnosis potential than previous reports, which can provide more reliable preliminary diagnosis results for primary hospitals, effectively reduce misdiagnosis, and provide references for early treatment.

Clinical Medicine & ResearchVol. 22(4)
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.