Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After IFR- vs FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization
In a large nationwide registry of patients undergoing physiology-based coronary revascularization, there were no significant differences in MACE or all-cause mortality between IFR and FFR-guided revascularization at 5 years.
Authors
- Karolina Berntorp (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8966-2112)
- Matthias Götberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0912-7927)
- Allen Jeremias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2328-4686)
- Rikard Linder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2568-0981)
- Ole Fröbert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-345X)
- Sacharias von Koch (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8398-4221)
- Troels Yndigegn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8960-2125)
- David Erlinge (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-5766)
- Moman A. Mohammad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4242-9801)
- Sasha M. Koul (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8408-8698)
Institutions
- Lund University (SE)
- Örebro University (SE)
- Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- St. Francis Hospital (US)
- Örebro University Hospital (SE)
- Skåne University Hospital (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2025-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.12.003
- Citations
- 6
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 12.04