Minority Health Social Vulnerability and Its Association with Cancer Incidence: A Nationwide Ecological Investigation

<b>Background:</b> Cancer is a major public health concern in the United States, especially among minority populations. Area-level social determinants of health (SDOH) influence cancer outcomes, but the impact of the Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index (MHSVI) on cancer incidence at the county level is less understood.<b>Methods:</b> We analyzed ecological data from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality for 3,232 counties in 2019. Exposures included MHSVI themes: socioeconomic, household composition, minority status/language, housing/transportation, healthcare infrastructure/access, and medical vulnerability (continuous). Overall MHSVI was categorized into low (.01/.25), moderate (.26/.74), and high (.75/1) percentiles. The outcome was the total number of cancer cases (continuous). Covariates included US regions and rural-urban regions. Unadjusted and adjusted negative binomial regressions with population weighting were performed using STATA/MPv.17; <i>P</i> values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.<b>Results:</b> A total of 3,232 counties were analyzed, with an average of 2,817.9 (SD:7,733.5) cancer cases, ranging from 16 to 201,547. All variables were significantly associated with cancer cases in unadjusted analyses. Adjusted analysis showed increased cancer incidence in moderate (IRR:0.94, 95%CI:0.92-0.96, <i>P</i><0.001) and high (IRR:0.86, 95%CI:0.84-0.88, <i>P</i><0.001) MHSVI areas compared to low MHSVI areas. Regional differences were observed, with increased cancer incidence in the Northeast (IRR:1.18, 95%CI:1.15-1.22, <i>P</i><0.001), South (IRR:1.03, 95% CI:1.01-1.05, <i>P</i><0.001), and West (IRR:0.92, 95%CI:0.90-0.94, <i>P</i><0.001) compared to the Midwest. Rural areas had a slight increase in cancer incidence compared to urban areas (IRR:1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.04, <i>P</i><0.001).<b>Conclusions:</b> Our study highlights the significant association between MHSVI and cancer incidence at the county level. Regional and rural-urban differences were evident, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions addressing SDOH to reduce cancer disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Medicine & Research
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3121/cmr.2024.1856
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Minority Health Social Vulnerability and Its Association with Cancer Incidence: A Nationwide Ecological Investigation

David Puthoff, Apoorva Jayarangaiah, Abdul R. Shour, Ronald Anguzu et al.
Clinical Medicine & Research
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Minority Health Social Vulnerability and Its Association with Cancer Incidence: A Nationwide Ecological Investigation

David Puthoff, Apoorva Jayarangaiah, Abdul R. Shour, Ronald Anguzu, Adedayo A. Onitilo
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Cancer is a major public health concern in the United States, especially among minority populations. Area-level social determinants of health (SDOH) influence cancer outcomes, but the impact of the Minority Health Social Vulnerability Index (MHSVI) on cancer incidence at the county level is less understood.<b>Methods:</b> We analyzed ecological data from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality for 3,232 counties in 2019. Exposures included MHSVI themes: socioeconomic, household composition, minority status/language, housing/transportation, healthcare infrastructure/access, and medical vulnerability (continuous). Overall MHSVI was categorized into low (.01/.25), moderate (.26/.74), and high (.75/1) percentiles. The outcome was the total number of cancer cases (continuous). Covariates included US regions and rural-urban regions. Unadjusted and adjusted negative binomial regressions with population weighting were performed using STATA/MPv.17; <i>P</i> values ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.<b>Results:</b> A total of 3,232 counties were analyzed, with an average of 2,817.9 (SD:7,733.5) cancer cases, ranging from 16 to 201,547. All variables were significantly associated with cancer cases in unadjusted analyses. Adjusted analysis showed increased cancer incidence in moderate (IRR:0.94, 95%CI:0.92-0.96, <i>P</i><0.001) and high (IRR:0.86, 95%CI:0.84-0.88, <i>P</i><0.001) MHSVI areas compared to low MHSVI areas. Regional differences were observed, with increased cancer incidence in the Northeast (IRR:1.18, 95%CI:1.15-1.22, <i>P</i><0.001), South (IRR:1.03, 95% CI:1.01-1.05, <i>P</i><0.001), and West (IRR:0.92, 95%CI:0.90-0.94, <i>P</i><0.001) compared to the Midwest. Rural areas had a slight increase in cancer incidence compared to urban areas (IRR:1.03, 95%CI:1.01-1.04, <i>P</i><0.001).<b>Conclusions:</b> Our study highlights the significant association between MHSVI and cancer incidence at the county level. Regional and rural-urban differences were evident, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions addressing SDOH to reduce cancer disparities.

Clinical Medicine & ResearchVol. 22(4)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Essentia Health (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Marshfield Clinic (US)
American Society of Clinical Oncology, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.