Evaluating the capability of UAV-Derived DEMs for flood hazard analysis

This study evaluates the flood extent, depth, velocity, and flood hazard analyses across 100, 500, and 1000 return periods using 0.1 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m DEM data derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). The Ulus settlement (T & uuml;rkiye) was selected as the case study area. The primary input data include DEMs produced from the DJI Mavic 2 Pro drone and flood flows derived from the SWAT rainfall-runoff model for the Ulus River and its tributaries. Flood hazard analyses were conducted using the 2D LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model using a constant Manning n value (n = 0.035) to evaluate spatial resolution variability. The findings indicate that as the resolution improves from 1 m to 0.1 m, the model runtime increases significantly (711 times on average), as do average calculation errors. Meanwhile, the spatial distribution of flood extent and hazard classes for people decreases by approximately 0.7% to 9%. However, the differences between resolutions from 0.1 m to 1 m in terms of depth, velocity, and inundation extent are not substantial. Therefore, using a 0.1 m UAV DEM resolution is not cost-effective, especially for large areas, due to the increased model instability caused by surface roughness and the longer processing time required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Geography
Published
2025-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.2025.2467912
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the capability of UAV-Derived DEMs for flood hazard analysis

Hasan Özdemir, Abdullah Akbaş
2 citations
Physical Geography
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
article

Evaluating the capability of UAV-Derived DEMs for flood hazard analysis

Hasan Özdemir, Abdullah Akbaş
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the flood extent, depth, velocity, and flood hazard analyses across 100, 500, and 1000 return periods using 0.1 m, 0.5 m, and 1 m DEM data derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). The Ulus settlement (T & uuml;rkiye) was selected as the case study area. The primary input data include DEMs produced from the DJI Mavic 2 Pro drone and flood flows derived from the SWAT rainfall-runoff model for the Ulus River and its tributaries. Flood hazard analyses were conducted using the 2D LISFLOOD-FP hydrodynamic model using a constant Manning n value (n = 0.035) to evaluate spatial resolution variability. The findings indicate that as the resolution improves from 1 m to 0.1 m, the model runtime increases significantly (711 times on average), as do average calculation errors. Meanwhile, the spatial distribution of flood extent and hazard classes for people decreases by approximately 0.7% to 9%. However, the differences between resolutions from 0.1 m to 1 m in terms of depth, velocity, and inundation extent are not substantial. Therefore, using a 0.1 m UAV DEM resolution is not cost-effective, especially for large areas, due to the increased model instability caused by surface roughness and the longer processing time required.

Physical GeographyVol. 46(3)
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.