Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case

Abstract This study aims to provide an overview of the distribution of the Spanish scientific workforce focusing on differences in authorship position by gender, academic age, number of authors, and research field. The results show some degree of parity in younger age cohorts and areas such as biomedicine, but little participation of females in the oldest age cohort and areas such as mathematics. In addition, the presence of women undergoes significant changes in certain areas and decreases in oldest age cohorts. This circumstance leads to a low probability of finding women or junior researchers in relevant authorship positions. Policymakers should know that inequalities in the scientific workforce must be considered when addressing/proposing scientific evaluation criteria.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Evaluation
Published
2024-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaf008
Citations
5
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case

Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez, Fernanda Morillo, Manuel Escabias
5 citations
Research Evaluation
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
article

Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case

Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez, Fernanda Morillo, Manuel Escabias
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to provide an overview of the distribution of the Spanish scientific workforce focusing on differences in authorship position by gender, academic age, number of authors, and research field. The results show some degree of parity in younger age cohorts and areas such as biomedicine, but little participation of females in the oldest age cohort and areas such as mathematics. In addition, the presence of women undergoes significant changes in certain areas and decreases in oldest age cohorts. This circumstance leads to a low probability of finding women or junior researchers in relevant authorship positions. Policymakers should know that inequalities in the scientific workforce must be considered when addressing/proposing scientific evaluation criteria.

Research EvaluationVol. 34
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES), Universidad de Granada (ES), Instituto de Filosofía (ES), Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (ES)
European Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case — Zaida Chinchilla‐Rodríguez, Fernanda Morillo, et al. · Research Evaluation (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS