Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy

<i>Objective.</i>Achieving FLASH dose rate with pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy is challenging. However, utilizing a single energy layer with a ridge filter (RF) can maintain dose rate and conformality. Yet, changes in patient anatomy over the treatment course can render the RF obsolete. Unfortunately, creating a new RF is time-consuming, thus, incompatible with online adaptation. To address this, we propose to re-optimize the spot weights while keeping the same initial RF.<i>Approach.</i>Data from six head and neck cancer patients with a repeated computed tomography (CT<sub>2</sub>) were used. FLASH treatment plans were generated with three methods on CT<sub>2</sub>: 'full-adaptation' (FA), optimized from scratch with a new RF; 'spot-adaptation only' (SAO), re-using initial RF but adjusting plan spot weights; and 'no adaptation' (NoA) where the dose from initial plans on initial CT (CT<sub>1</sub>) was recomputed on CT<sub>2</sub>. The prescribed dose per fraction was 9 Gy. Different beam angles were tested for each CT<sub>2</sub>(1 beam per fraction). The FA, SAO and NoA plans were then compared on CT<sub>2</sub>.<i>Main results.</i>Fractions with SAO showed a median decrease of 0.05 Gy for<i>D</i>98% and a median increase of 0.03 Gy for<i>D</i>2% of CTV when compared to their homologous FA plans on nominal case. Median conformity number decreased by 0.03. Median max dose to spinal cord increased by 0.09 Gy. The largest median increase in mean dose to organs was 0.03 Gy to the mandible. The largest observed median difference in organs receiving a minimal dose rate of 40 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>was 0.5% for the mandible. Up to 16 of the 20 evaluated SAO fractions were thus deemed clinically acceptable, with up to 8 NoA plans already acceptable before adaptation.<i>Significance.</i>Proposed SAO workflow showed that for most of our evaluated plans, daily reprinting of RF was not necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adb9b2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Ana María Barragán Montero et al.
1 citations
Physics in Medicine and Biology
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
article

Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy

Edmond Sterpin, John A. Lee, Macarena Chocan Vera, Ana María Barragán Montero, Camille Draguet, Benjamin Roberfroid
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<i>Objective.</i>Achieving FLASH dose rate with pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy is challenging. However, utilizing a single energy layer with a ridge filter (RF) can maintain dose rate and conformality. Yet, changes in patient anatomy over the treatment course can render the RF obsolete. Unfortunately, creating a new RF is time-consuming, thus, incompatible with online adaptation. To address this, we propose to re-optimize the spot weights while keeping the same initial RF.<i>Approach.</i>Data from six head and neck cancer patients with a repeated computed tomography (CT<sub>2</sub>) were used. FLASH treatment plans were generated with three methods on CT<sub>2</sub>: 'full-adaptation' (FA), optimized from scratch with a new RF; 'spot-adaptation only' (SAO), re-using initial RF but adjusting plan spot weights; and 'no adaptation' (NoA) where the dose from initial plans on initial CT (CT<sub>1</sub>) was recomputed on CT<sub>2</sub>. The prescribed dose per fraction was 9 Gy. Different beam angles were tested for each CT<sub>2</sub>(1 beam per fraction). The FA, SAO and NoA plans were then compared on CT<sub>2</sub>.<i>Main results.</i>Fractions with SAO showed a median decrease of 0.05 Gy for<i>D</i>98% and a median increase of 0.03 Gy for<i>D</i>2% of CTV when compared to their homologous FA plans on nominal case. Median conformity number decreased by 0.03. Median max dose to spinal cord increased by 0.09 Gy. The largest median increase in mean dose to organs was 0.03 Gy to the mandible. The largest observed median difference in organs receiving a minimal dose rate of 40 Gy s<sup>-1</sup>was 0.5% for the mandible. Up to 16 of the 20 evaluated SAO fractions were thus deemed clinically acceptable, with up to 8 NoA plans already acceptable before adaptation.<i>Significance.</i>Proposed SAO workflow showed that for most of our evaluated plans, daily reprinting of RF was not necessary.

Physics in Medicine and BiologyVol. 70(6)
Institute of Particle Physics (CA), Molecular Oncology (United States) (US), Mathys (Netherlands) (NL), UCLouvain (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Wallonie-Bruxelles International
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.