Factors Influencing the Adoption of Green Libraries for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract This study was conducted to determine the factors influencing the adoption of green libraries for environmental sustainability, to find out the impacts and challenges faced by the librarians to adopt green libraries. For the systematic literature review, the study adopted the “Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” (PRISMA) as the methodology. Different search tools and techniques to access the relevant but extensive literature for the study were applied. Taylor and Francis, Emerald, Sage, IEEE, Elsevier, Wiley, EBSCO, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search the required literature. Initially, 844 documents were retrieved and after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, finally, 33 papers were finalized to conduct the systemic literature review. The findings revealed that external, internal, and institutional goals, technological advancements, Green Library (GL) initiatives, and sustainable development goals (SDGs) are the major factors in adopting GL. Funding issues and the lack of technology are the major challenges faced by librarians. This study is beneficial for the administration, policymakers, LIS schools, and library professionals to gain awareness, planning, and execution to establish green libraries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libri
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2024-0089
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Environmental Education and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Green Libraries for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Khurram Shahzad, Imran Ghaffar Sulehri, Muhammad Tariq
4 citations
Libri
Environmental Education and Sustainability
9.69
article

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Green Libraries for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Khurram Shahzad, Imran Ghaffar Sulehri, Muhammad Tariq
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study was conducted to determine the factors influencing the adoption of green libraries for environmental sustainability, to find out the impacts and challenges faced by the librarians to adopt green libraries. For the systematic literature review, the study adopted the “Preferred Reporting Items for the Systematic Review and Meta-analysis” (PRISMA) as the methodology. Different search tools and techniques to access the relevant but extensive literature for the study were applied. Taylor and Francis, Emerald, Sage, IEEE, Elsevier, Wiley, EBSCO, Scopus, and Google Scholar were used to search the required literature. Initially, 844 documents were retrieved and after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, finally, 33 papers were finalized to conduct the systemic literature review. The findings revealed that external, internal, and institutional goals, technological advancements, Green Library (GL) initiatives, and sustainable development goals (SDGs) are the major factors in adopting GL. Funding issues and the lack of technology are the major challenges faced by librarians. This study is beneficial for the administration, policymakers, LIS schools, and library professionals to gain awareness, planning, and execution to establish green libraries.

LibriVol. 75(1)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Government College University, Lahore (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Environmental Education and Sustainability
9.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.