Insurance and In-hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015–2020

Although insurance status has been linked to surgical outcomes in thoracic aortic operations, its specific association with the outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) repair remains underexplored. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive, population-based analysis to assess the association between insurance status and in-hospital outcomes after TAAD repair using a national registry.Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients using public and private insurance while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status.There were 2,380 (55.58%) and 1,468 (34.28%) patients under public and private insurance, respectively. Patients under public and private insurance had comparable time from admission to operation (<i>p</i> = 0.08) and adjusted in-hospital mortality rates (aOR = 1.172, 95 CI = 0.925-1.484, <i>p</i> = 0.19). However, patients under public insurance had higher mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.185, 95 CI = 1.024-1.373, <i>p</i> = 0.02), acute kidney injury (aOR = 1.213, 95 CI = 1.052-1.399, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and infection (aOR = 1.428, 95 CI = 1.087-1.876, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Moreover, patients under public insurance had higher transfer-out rate (<i>p</i> < 0.01), longer length of stay (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and higher total hospital charge (<i>p</i> < 0.01).Although patients with public insurance had comparable adjusted mortality outcomes to those of privately insured patients, they experienced higher rates of postoperative complications and resource utilization. Future studies should investigate the underlying systemic reasons for these disparities and explore strategies for improving surgical outcomes and ensuring equitable healthcare delivery for these vulnerable populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2531-3208
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insurance and In-hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015–2020

Stephen J. Huddleston, Renxi Li
1 citations
The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
1.52
article

Insurance and In-hospital Outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: A Population Study of National Inpatient Sample from 2015–2020

Stephen J. Huddleston, Renxi Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although insurance status has been linked to surgical outcomes in thoracic aortic operations, its specific association with the outcomes of Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) repair remains underexplored. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive, population-based analysis to assess the association between insurance status and in-hospital outcomes after TAAD repair using a national registry.Patients who underwent TAAD repair were identified in National Inpatient Sample from the last quarter of 2015 to 2020. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients using public and private insurance while adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, primary payer status, and transfer-in status.There were 2,380 (55.58%) and 1,468 (34.28%) patients under public and private insurance, respectively. Patients under public and private insurance had comparable time from admission to operation (<i>p</i> = 0.08) and adjusted in-hospital mortality rates (aOR = 1.172, 95 CI = 0.925-1.484, <i>p</i> = 0.19). However, patients under public insurance had higher mechanical ventilation (aOR = 1.185, 95 CI = 1.024-1.373, <i>p</i> = 0.02), acute kidney injury (aOR = 1.213, 95 CI = 1.052-1.399, <i>p</i> = 0.01), and infection (aOR = 1.428, 95 CI = 1.087-1.876, <i>p</i> = 0.01). Moreover, patients under public insurance had higher transfer-out rate (<i>p</i> < 0.01), longer length of stay (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and higher total hospital charge (<i>p</i> < 0.01).Although patients with public insurance had comparable adjusted mortality outcomes to those of privately insured patients, they experienced higher rates of postoperative complications and resource utilization. Future studies should investigate the underlying systemic reasons for these disparities and explore strategies for improving surgical outcomes and ensuring equitable healthcare delivery for these vulnerable populations.

The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonVol. 73(06)
University of Minnesota (US), George Washington University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.