Mechanical countermeasures for spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome during 30-days of head down tilt bed rest: design, implementation, and tolerability
After longer duration space missions, some astronauts experience structural and functional changes in the eye and structural changes in the brain, termed Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). Countermeasures against SANS are required to minimize potential operation impacts and negative long-term health consequences. Headward fluid shifts, which appear to promote SANS, provide a target for countermeasures. The SANS countermeasures study, a 30 days strict head down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) study, tested two mechanical countermeasures aimed at reversing cephalad fluid overload. This work presents design and methodology of the study with a focus on countermeasure implementation and tolerability. Following baseline evaluations, participants were randomized to four groups and HDTBR commenced: Daily application of 25 mmHg lower body negative pressure for 6 h, six-hour bilateral venous constrictive thigh cuffs following moderate cycling exercise on 6 days per week, a negative control group without countermeasures, and a positive control group with HDTBR interruption for 6 h per day by sitting upright. The potential of these countermeasures for future space applications was examined in 86 different experiments, which will be reported elsewhere. Comfort ratings ranging from 1 (very uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable) were used to asses tolerability. Overall, 47 participants (20 women) completed the study. Out of 4,032 h scheduled for both countermeasures, 10.5 h were not performed due to medical issues unrelated to the countermeasures. Mean comfort ratings were 3.9 in men and 4.4 in women in the lower body negative pressure group (p = 0.1356) and 4.2 in men and 3.9 in women in the thigh cuff group (p = 0.1604). We conclude that both countermeasures were well tolerated and applied under well controlled conditions, thus, allowing for meaningful analyses of efficacy in attenuating HDTBR effects.
Authors
- Timo Frett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-1177)
- Jan‐Niklas Hönemann
- Laura de Boni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-482X)
- Edwin Mulder (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1200-5792)
- Alex S. Huang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-9608)
- Brandon R. Macias (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2527-5089)
- Jan Schmitz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0282-097X)
- Steven S. Laurie (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8794-3583)
- Alexandra Noppe
- Karina Marshall‐Goebel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-7625)
- Stefan Moestl
- Jens Jordan
- Maria Bohmeier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3107-9551)
- Ann Charlotte Ewald
- Andrea Nitsche
- Dominik Pesta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5089-3586)
- Petra Frings‐Meuthen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5291-4419)
- Tilmann Kramer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-7607)
- Jens Tank (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-1187)
- Patricia Loehr
- Nicolas Klischies
Institutions
- KBR (United States) (US)
- University of Cologne (DE)
- UC San Diego Health System (US)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases (DE)
- Johnson Space Center (US)
- University Hospital Cologne (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Published
- 2025-02-24
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1530783
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- Spaceflight effects on biology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 5.82
Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt