Mechanical countermeasures for spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome during 30-days of head down tilt bed rest: design, implementation, and tolerability

After longer duration space missions, some astronauts experience structural and functional changes in the eye and structural changes in the brain, termed Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). Countermeasures against SANS are required to minimize potential operation impacts and negative long-term health consequences. Headward fluid shifts, which appear to promote SANS, provide a target for countermeasures. The SANS countermeasures study, a 30 days strict head down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) study, tested two mechanical countermeasures aimed at reversing cephalad fluid overload. This work presents design and methodology of the study with a focus on countermeasure implementation and tolerability. Following baseline evaluations, participants were randomized to four groups and HDTBR commenced: Daily application of 25 mmHg lower body negative pressure for 6 h, six-hour bilateral venous constrictive thigh cuffs following moderate cycling exercise on 6 days per week, a negative control group without countermeasures, and a positive control group with HDTBR interruption for 6 h per day by sitting upright. The potential of these countermeasures for future space applications was examined in 86 different experiments, which will be reported elsewhere. Comfort ratings ranging from 1 (very uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable) were used to asses tolerability. Overall, 47 participants (20 women) completed the study. Out of 4,032 h scheduled for both countermeasures, 10.5 h were not performed due to medical issues unrelated to the countermeasures. Mean comfort ratings were 3.9 in men and 4.4 in women in the lower body negative pressure group (p = 0.1356) and 4.2 in men and 3.9 in women in the thigh cuff group (p = 0.1604). We conclude that both countermeasures were well tolerated and applied under well controlled conditions, thus, allowing for meaningful analyses of efficacy in attenuating HDTBR effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2025-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1530783
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanical countermeasures for spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome during 30-days of head down tilt bed rest: design, implementation, and tolerability

Timo Frett, Jan‐Niklas Hönemann, Laura de Boni, Edwin Mulder et al.
5 citations
Frontiers in Physiology
Spaceflight effects on biology
5.82
article

Mechanical countermeasures for spaceflight-associated neuro-ocular syndrome during 30-days of head down tilt bed rest: design, implementation, and tolerability

Timo Frett, Jan‐Niklas Hönemann, Laura de Boni, Edwin Mulder, Alex S. Huang, Brandon R. Macias, Jan Schmitz, Steven S. Laurie, Alexandra Noppe, Karina Marshall‐Goebel, Stefan Moestl, Jens Jordan, Maria Bohmeier, Ann Charlotte Ewald, Andrea Nitsche, Dominik Pesta, Petra Frings‐Meuthen, Tilmann Kramer, Jens Tank, Patricia Loehr, Nicolas Klischies
article en
5 citations

Abstract

After longer duration space missions, some astronauts experience structural and functional changes in the eye and structural changes in the brain, termed Spaceflight-Associated Neuro-Ocular Syndrome (SANS). Countermeasures against SANS are required to minimize potential operation impacts and negative long-term health consequences. Headward fluid shifts, which appear to promote SANS, provide a target for countermeasures. The SANS countermeasures study, a 30 days strict head down tilt bed rest (HDTBR) study, tested two mechanical countermeasures aimed at reversing cephalad fluid overload. This work presents design and methodology of the study with a focus on countermeasure implementation and tolerability. Following baseline evaluations, participants were randomized to four groups and HDTBR commenced: Daily application of 25 mmHg lower body negative pressure for 6 h, six-hour bilateral venous constrictive thigh cuffs following moderate cycling exercise on 6 days per week, a negative control group without countermeasures, and a positive control group with HDTBR interruption for 6 h per day by sitting upright. The potential of these countermeasures for future space applications was examined in 86 different experiments, which will be reported elsewhere. Comfort ratings ranging from 1 (very uncomfortable) to 5 (very comfortable) were used to asses tolerability. Overall, 47 participants (20 women) completed the study. Out of 4,032 h scheduled for both countermeasures, 10.5 h were not performed due to medical issues unrelated to the countermeasures. Mean comfort ratings were 3.9 in men and 4.4 in women in the lower body negative pressure group (p = 0.1356) and 4.2 in men and 3.9 in women in the thigh cuff group (p = 0.1604). We conclude that both countermeasures were well tolerated and applied under well controlled conditions, thus, allowing for meaningful analyses of efficacy in attenuating HDTBR effects.

Frontiers in PhysiologyVol. 16
KBR (United States) (US), University of Cologne (DE), UC San Diego Health System (US), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE), Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging Associated Diseases (DE), Johnson Space Center (US), University Hospital Cologne (DE)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Spaceflight effects on biology
5.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.