Political orientation and Scientific Rationalism Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: A Study of Moms-Holic Baby Community Members

This study examines the discourse of “momcafe” members during the COVID -19 pandemic regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Members of this community pride themselves on making claims based on objective scientific facts. However, despite this pride, when deciding on vaccination, they tend to rely more on subjective attitudes and politically framed science rather then objective science. Furthermore, many of these members are often unaware of their own subjective and political biases. This issue will be explored in three specific aspects: first, the distrust of the Moon Jae-in administration and the belief in vaccine conspiracy theories under the guise of science, second, the support of government policies and emphasis on the credibility of science and technology based on personal experiences and surrounding information, and lastly, the problem of falling into confusion due to an excessive trust in science or information that is deemed scientific, leading to an uncritical acceptance of related information. The existing research on Korean housewives has largely focused on their emotions and child-rearing concerns. This study aims to uncover a new perspective on current Korean housewives by dealing with aspects that have not been examined in previous research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Center for Civic Politics Research
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54968/civicpol.2024.9.31
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political orientation and Scientific Rationalism Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: A Study of Moms-Holic Baby Community Members

J. Roh
1 citations
Center for Civic Politics Research
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
article

Political orientation and Scientific Rationalism Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: A Study of Moms-Holic Baby Community Members

J. Roh
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the discourse of “momcafe” members during the COVID -19 pandemic regarding COVID-19 vaccination. Members of this community pride themselves on making claims based on objective scientific facts. However, despite this pride, when deciding on vaccination, they tend to rely more on subjective attitudes and politically framed science rather then objective science. Furthermore, many of these members are often unaware of their own subjective and political biases. This issue will be explored in three specific aspects: first, the distrust of the Moon Jae-in administration and the belief in vaccine conspiracy theories under the guise of science, second, the support of government policies and emphasis on the credibility of science and technology based on personal experiences and surrounding information, and lastly, the problem of falling into confusion due to an excessive trust in science or information that is deemed scientific, leading to an uncritical acceptance of related information. The existing research on Korean housewives has largely focused on their emotions and child-rearing concerns. This study aims to uncover a new perspective on current Korean housewives by dealing with aspects that have not been examined in previous research.

Center for Civic Politics ResearchVol. 9
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.